User talk:Mac canccce
While I personally think that the information you are adding is useful and informative, those edits cannot be limited to a "copy and paste" operation. They must respect the proper copyright and neutrality guidelines here in Wikipedia. Other than that, good luck. Juancarlos2004 (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Your edits do contain useful information, but the problem is how to properly describe what you want to add and where to put it. The best way to learn about this is to read Wikipedia's rules and guidelines, since they provide better explanations for how things are supposed to work.
- For example, your recent Plan Patriota edits seem to go into original research, since only one of the two cited sources talks about Plan Patriota in particular. The other one does not mention the Plan.
- I believe that information should be included in other Wikipedia articles, articles more relevant to the matter at hand.
- But a connection to Plan Patriota shouldn't be assumed in every case, unless the source explicitly states it. Information about extrajudicial executions that are not part of Plan Patriota shouldn't be mentioned in a Plan Patriota article.
- In that case, you may be adding your own personal logic to a source, and possibly making the result less neutral and not accurate. Juancarlos2004 (talk) 18:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Corporate crime
[edit]This is a general article on Corporate crime, please only add links that discuss the general topic in detail - not random examples. Thanks. Kuru talk 23:49, 31 July 2008 (UTC)