User talk:MRFS

Welcome!

Hello, MRFS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your silly question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Bourge^talk 10:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear MRFS Let me thank You giving the link to the article - I am reading it (I can do it only in free time so it is not fast), and thank You again for Yours contributions.

What seems to me appropriate to do with the "proof section" 1 ) to make some explicit splitting of arguments which are quite simple and understandable like the ones you give in the section "Perron root" etc. and the arguments which are not simple (or at least we cannot find simple ones in the literature). And for those ones provide exact references.

2) To write some preface of the proof - saying: items MMM are simple and explained here, but for items NNN nor simple arguments exists (at least at textbooks like []...[]) So we provide exact references.

2a) At the moment I do not quite understand the fact that "r" is simple root of char. pol. - is there some simple proof for it ? Would You be so kind to comment on it ?

What do You think about such "splitings" ?

--- delete mail :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexander Chervov (talk • contribs) 17:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]