User talk:MJDecker

MJDecker, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MJDecker! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MJDecker (talk) 21:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tierra de reyes McVeigh / talk 19:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enough

The information you are placing already in the introduction of the article also're repeating the same, the references are repeated. Please stop. Make changes without reaching any consensus.--McVeigh / talk 20:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You'll go ?, I'm telling you that the information you're already putting this start introducing the article. Plus you're adding clarifications and information without references. And apparently do not want to reach any agreement, do not even take the time to read the messages. Just do what you please.--McVeigh / talk 20:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All information conforms to every Wikipedia standard or citation. Articles are intended to give information on a topic. Almost no useful information is given in the original article. The English is so poor it can barely be understood by English speakers. Information can appear in more than one tab. Obviously, you had not issue with the previous posted information. You began deleting information when it was modified to be better written and give more information than was previously offered. Then you threaten me with being blocked. You are throwing a tantrum because you seem to view this page as your personal page. Articles are for people seeking information. Not your ego.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MJDecker reported by User:McVeigh (Result: ). Thank you. McVeigh / talk 20:21, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Tierra de reyes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tu Dia Alegre (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tu Dia Alegre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tu Dia Alegre

Hello, MJDecker. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Tu Dia Alegre".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]