User talk:MITRO BOYS

July 2022

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Serie A broadcasters. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 20:52, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The link I have added is not a promote to any website also it is not a spam as you think, clearly it is a link of the TV Right holder of SereA for Republic of Kosovo. (Wikipedia is not a place to spread lgbt) MITRO BOYS (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

we aren't interested in link farms, the list you're adding it to is for existing articles only. Also your suggesting re: "wikipedia isn't the place to spread lgbt" is nothing short of homophobic and any further comments about it will be reported. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a place to give/receice opinion about everything in life which means it is freedom of speech, if you think in other way than me doesn't mean you or me are wrong. YOU MUST LEARN FREEDOM OF SPEECH. MITRO BOYS (talk) 21:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of speech is a legal term that doesn't apply to Wikipedia. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You sure?

then 'homophobic' is????? MITRO BOYS (talk) 21:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It means if you make homophobic comments like you did earlier, you'll be blocked. It's simple. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt.(it is just your thought)

I saw of your page that you stand with BLM(which is a very good thing), about 'HoMoPhObIc' it was just misunderstood by you.

Bay bay

have a nice day MITRO BOYS (talk) 21:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of Serie A broadcasters shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:15, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Agon Mustafa per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agon Mustafa. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 09:56, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61237

is closed. Thanks @L235: Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61313

is closed. CU block. I cannot see CU logs. Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock discussion

Reviewing the talk page, I would oppose unblocking anyway, so I apologize for wasting ArbCom's time. Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]