Jump to content

User talk:MIDI/2021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Nomination of List of people who performed on Beatles recordings/Table for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people who performed on Beatles recordings/Table, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who performed on Beatles recordings/Table until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mu chord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dissonance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for William Macpherson (judge)

On 16 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article William Macpherson (judge), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 22:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Port Way

On 6 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Port Way, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that historians do not agree on how Port Way entered the Roman town of Calleva Atrebatum? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Port Way. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Port Way), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Katumani Experimental Farm

Notice

The article Katumani Experimental Farm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBUILD/the GNG. Non-notable farm; BEFORE search yields only scattered mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Katumani Experimental Farm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katumani Experimental Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katumani Experimental Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freddy Marks, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chelsea and ITV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Queen's Award category

Be aware of this and the fact that the fun sponges might be coming after you sooner rather than later to delete it. --10mmsocket (talk) 21:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. MIDI (talk) 08:19, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Wow, they really were quick! 10mmsocket (talk) 08:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Nah, that was me! I G7'd it; there's no way it would survive another AfD so soon after the previous one – especially as the only change was a slightly different name. If the award is as prestigious as it purports to be, then it's on par with the MBE and therefore could be justified as a defining feature of the recipient. I can't help but feel that the problem of it not being seen as a defining feature is that it's a relatively new scheme and I suppose it's relatively little-known. MIDI (talk) 08:49, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hungerford massacre, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Abingdon, Kalashnikov and Zabala.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Astra Farm

Notice

The article Astra Farm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not even a settlement. Most likely only a farm. There are no cited sources that prove that it was ever part of the Eastern Province.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas (Heyyyyyyy) 15:38, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia podcast

Hi MIDI,

Hope you're well. I was wondering whether you'd be up for speaking with me a bit about your work on Wikipedia? I'm a podcast producer and we're making a documentary about Wikipedia. I've already interviewed a number of people from the community and I've come across some edits you've made on pages I'm interested in, and was hoping I could talk to you a bit about it.

Thanks!

Wearecrowd (talk) 14:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Wearecrowd:! Sounds interesting. May I ask which page(s) made you want to drop me a line? Thanks, MIDI (talk) 11:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi @MIDI:, thanks so much for getting back to me. It was the Murder of Sarah Everard page that I was looking at and saw you've been quite active on. Is there an email I could contact you on directly, so I could tell you more?

Thanks, Wearecrowd (talk) 11:13, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Sure! My emails are open – Special:EmailUser/MIDI. MIDI (talk) 10:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Great, have sent you an email. Thanks! Wearecrowd (talk) 12:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, MIDI. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:55, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Where's the cake? ;) MIDI (talk) 08:57, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Jill Murphy (Actress)

There are still two citations that need to be added, otherwise the AFD will be back up. --TheWingedWarrior (talk) 12:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

The referencing of the article is not good, and it doesn't seem to be easy to find reliable sources to add to the article. That said, I objected to the parts of the proposed deletion rationale that said the article was more like a blog and sounded like a hoax. The article now has two citations for this actor's work, which isn't brilliant but stops it from being an unreferenced biography. If you do take the article to WP:AFD, You may wish to consider the notability guidelines for entertainers. MIDI (talk) 13:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

ITN edit

I added the middle initial in response to a comment, now at WP:ERRORS, that the deceased person could be confused with a living person of the same name. 331dot (talk) 17:59, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for flagging – I'll self-revert and comment there. MIDI (talk) 18:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

New Wikipedia Guideline Proposed which you might be interested in.

Hello. I am letting editors know who participated in the recent discussions that decided whether the Killing of David Amess should be called "killing, murder, or assassination", about a new Wikipedia essay being proposed for a new guideline. The essay, Wikipedia:Assassination, explains how the common definition of "assassination" does not determine an article's title. Only reliable sources can determine whether it is murder/killing or assassination. Since you participated in those recent discussions, I wanted to drop a message to you about this new proposal. If you want to leave your opinion about it, you can do so in this discussion. Have a good day and keep up the good editing! Elijahandskip (talk) 01:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing MIDI a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Bobherry Talk Edits 03:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
12 years!? Blimey. You've made a happy man feel very old. MIDI (talk) 10:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ray Weston

Notice

The article Ray Weston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There isn't any in depth coverage of this drummer. Allmusic lists his credits in various bands but that's hardly unique.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sikonmina (talk) 13:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hungerford police murders

Hello! Your submission of Hungerford police murders at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! GRuban (talk) 20:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Hungerford police murders

On 20 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hungerford police murders, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in December 1876, two police officers were murdered by brothers who had poached just two pheasants and a jay? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hungerford police murders. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hungerford police murders), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 8,510 views (709.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Ooh! Thanks leek. MIDI (talk) 10:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lurgan College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Cowan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Rolf W. Schnyder

Hello, this is random but I noticed you made edits to Rolf W. Schnyder years ago, and I was recently copyediting the article because most of what was added by a COI editor is pretty bad stuff. No sources. It's so puffed up it reads like satire. I can't find any sources on the web for 90% of it, but I feel a little bad deleting content from a deceased person's WP:BIO article without certainty. But it also doesn't fit Wikipedia guidelines. Do you have any recommendations for a course of action? Thanks for your time. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 16:48, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Pyrrho the Skeptic:. I've just started looking into this, and I've just blocked User:Ulysse-nardin for WP:ORGNAME. I can't help but feel this is a case of WP:MEMORIAL, and having skim-read the article I can't see anything that suggests this person is notable. I will raise this at WP:AFD if you like? MIDI (talk) 17:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolf W. Schnyder. MIDI (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. I think that's the right move, yes. This article has been bothering me for a while. I appreciate the action taken. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 17:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
It was a LONG time ago I edited it – not only that, but it was an AWB edit so one I'm even less likely to remember! :) MIDI (talk) 17:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Merchandise giveaway nomination

A t-shirt!
A token of thanks
Hi MIDI! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
A snowflake!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MIDI/2021&oldid=1063579958"