User talk:MGSpiller

Hello MGSpiller, and welcome to Wikipedia! If you want to learn more about the contribution process, definitely check out the tutorial. It's a really simple and easy explanation of all the basics.

TIPS:

If you have any questions about Wikipedia and don't know where to look, try the How do I do that? section of help.
Get your feet wet as soon as you can by being bold in editing (and using the Show Preview button).
Read what Wikipedia is not.
Learn how to avoid common mistakes.
At Wikipedia, neutrality means representing all viewpoints as opposed to just one. Read the neutral point of view tutorial to learn more.
As you learn more about Wikipedia, you may want to check out the Manual of Style and the Policies and Guidelines.

I hope you enjoy your stay here and feel free to reply to this welcome message on my talk page. - Craigy (Talk)

(To sign a post like I just did, enter three tildes ~~~ where you want your name to appear. The three tildes will automatically be converted into your username. Adding a fourth tilde will insert a timestamp, as well.)

Bridge

I undone your move on Bingley's Beckfoot Bridge. Although a lot of Wikipedia articles have lower case words, this should not take precedence over correct spelling. I'd be happy to see it moved back if you can provide me with evidence the current spelling is incorrect. Mgm|^(talk) 20:51, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

Re: Crossflatts

are you sure? my bro lives there and its always spelt as one word. ill check the map book...

it is 2 words. cross flatts metro station is spelt as one word(i think). sorry my mistake

Re: Connexions

changed your 'vandalism,' edit as Connexions do regularly share personal client information with the police and/or their agents. Many staff resigned when this was brought in as it became a 'non-confidential,' service. the information is used in tasking meetings; with the 'partners,' who justify using it as it may 'stop potential crime,'check out the fine print' at ; crimereduction.gov.uk/toolkits/ui0306.htm, welcome to the new world of targetting individuals who 'may,' be doing something, from a subjectie, note NOT evidence based perspective. user:vanon 241005

Burley in Wharfedale

Hi, thanks for you message, I left you a response on my talk page- hope that was the right place! Matt Palmer 19:08, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just read your response - thanks for the help! Matt Palmer 19:22, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Thornton and Allerton

Hello, good work on Thornton and Allerton, and thanks for the contribution. However, you forgot to add any references to the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. What websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Thornton and Allerton? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? Thank you very much. - SimonP 05:19, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What you have done looks good, thanks. If you want to read more about what I have been doing see Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#A_better_way_of_getting_articles_referenced. - SimonP 18:28, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Might also be worth adding similair to the other wards, I would but it may look a bit odd!--ElvisThePrince 17:03, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well I've sourced them all. I'm fairly happy with them now, a few could do with expanding the description (all 3 Keighley, Toller) which leaves Clayton, Ilkley, Manningham & Shipley where there were already substantial articles. I suppose it's time to wp:be bold and create sections on each about the wards, what do you reckon? As for you putting the sources in, I'm sure you could have guessed what I used. You created the template in the first place anyway. --MGSpiller 21:08, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I also completly forgot about http://www.bradfordinfo.com/census/WardProfiles.cfm which has the data accesabile in something other than IE, (the profiles may be worth basing some of the "qualitative" information for each ward on as well.)--ElvisThePrince 22:42, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I'd misplaced that link. I deliberately didn't read them after a couple as it would have been too easy to create copyvios. It was easier just to write a description of what I could see on my local maps. I'll add that link to them all Wednesday (probably) if you don't beat me to it. I think the BCSP should stay as well as a mapping reference. --MGSpiller 23:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Drofdarb

Alright? At the risk of being tedious, where about in Bradford are you from?--Crestville 00:58, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Small world. Never had too much trouble woth folk from Lancashire. Dunno why theres a problem. We shiuld gang up against southeners. Comin' up 'ere with their lager and their medeteranitan diets. I'm off to climb an unecesserily steep hill to buy bread.--Crestville 01:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bingley All Saints Parish Church1.jpg and others

Que? You seem to have edited a bunch of images I uploaded to commons 9 months ago with copyright tags & everything. I took them all & released them all so there should be no problem. To add 2 my confusion I can't see what the edit was. MGSpiller 02:12, 24 February 2006 (UTC) p.s. if i'm missing somthing obvious sorry, I'm checking after a session in the pub.[reply]

No problem, I didn't actually edit the images on the commons, the image you mentioned Image:Bingley All Saints Parish Church1.jpg had a page on wikipedia but no image here, it's a problem that sometimes happens. I tagged the page on wiki.riteme.site as needing deletion because it was empty, and the image was actually at commons. If you were watching the en page you would have seen the edit, but the page was then deleted by someone else. [1] so edit history doesn't exist. When you go to the page now what you are seeing is the version from the commons. It's kinda confusing, especially coming back from the pub hehe. If you have any other questions though feel free to ask, the images are fine though all that happened was a little housekeeping :) - cohesion★talk 06:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleobury Mortimer

I can 100% gaurantee to you that Cleobury Mortimer in Shropshire is a town! :) Talk:Cleobury Mortimer David 21:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chemical Brothers

Hi,

I see you made quite a few edits to the List of Live Performances by The Chemical Brothers page. If you think this page should stay on Wikipedia, please vote to keep it on the Votes For Deletion page as this article is currently under threat of deletion. Thanks, Martin Hinks 07:32, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bradford Riot

Hi, I noticed you'd left some good points on the Bradford Riot talk page. You seem like you're of sound and impartial judgement.... I've added some comments on the talk page about how the article could be improved - It may not interest you, but thought I'd let you know non-the-less. Hope it helps, keep up the good work, Jhamez 84 00:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Thanks for the comments left on the Oldham Riots talk page. I've since added one photograph to the article, but do very much agree with you that it needs more. I'm currently striving to get the article up to Wikipedia:Good articles criteria, and really valued your feedback. If you feel you want to make other suggestions, or contribute to the article further, please feel free. Thanks again, Jhamez 84 01:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liphook

I notice you have removed this town, as recognised by it's county council, from the List of towns in England. This is being discussed on Talk:List of towns in England as we need to establish what is a town. Nuttah68 15:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bradford

Wahey, another local Wikipedian (Brighouse, myself). Anyway, welcome :) Will (message me!) 20:52, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

York meetup

Hi MGSpiller. Just to let you know there is a Wikimedia meetup being planned in York for Tuesday. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:36, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds meetup

Hello! I don't know if you're aware but there is a wikimedia meet up in Leeds this Saturday (14 June) if you're interested. Hopefully you can make it. Regards IJA (talk) 17:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MGSpiller. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MGSpiller. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MGSpiller. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]