User talk:MDG
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ccwaters 19:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC) Hi there,
Can you please explain why the entry was removed?
Thanks, M
- Let's see: you added *[http://www.mapleleafs.com/ The better team from up the QEW] (REF: [1])to the Buffalo Sabres article. Do you really need an explanation?? ccwaters 18:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- Quite aside from that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a partisan blog, it'd be rather tough to claim Toronto's superiority this season. The Sabres are winning two games for every one they lose, the Maple Leafs are just barely over .500. RGTraynor 22:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
MDG Computers
[edit]Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. ccwaters 18:38, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User:MDG, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:User:MDG|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 02:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)