User talk:MASMI92
MASMI92, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi MASMI92! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC) |
January 2021
[edit]
Hello, I'm Asartea. I noticed that in this edit to 2021 Louisiana's 2nd congressional district special election, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Asartea Talk | Contribs 16:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Removing endorsements...again... If you read the political endorsement rules you'll see clearly "Lists of endorsements should only include endorsements which have been covered by reliable independent sources. This means endorsements should not be sourced solely to a Tweet or Instagram post, for example." Also, I monitor every day for these endorsements to be mentioned in independent sources and they haven't happened yet. So, you might want to read the rules yourself.
[edit]I have read WP:ENDORSE, thank you. Why is there no consistency then? On the 2021 Boston mayor election, the source for Michelle Wu’s endorsement by Elizabeth Warren is a tweet: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/2021_Boston_mayoral_election#Endorsements. In the 2020 US Senate in NC Race, the source for Cal’s endorsement by Obama was a Medium post by him: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/2020_United_States_Senate_election_in_North_Carolina#Endorsements_3. And for the 2020 US Senate in GA (Regular) race, the source for an Ossoff endorsement by him is also a Medium post by him: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/2020–21_United_States_Senate_election_in_Georgia#Endorsements_2. And this is across many of the 2020 US Senate pages. Why are these Medium posts and tweets considered reliable independent sources, but not the edits made by me? Muhibm0307 (talk) 05:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Revert
[edit]Hi - just a note to say no worries about the revert at 2022 Alaska's at-large congressional district special election. I was rolling back a bunch of edits that had been performed by an abusive sockpuppeteer, I didn't actually look at the actual edits individually. If you're able to confirm that the edit was legit, I'm happy with you reinstating it. Best Girth Summit (blether) 21:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)