User talk:M1475963

Welcome!

Hello, M1475963, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Peter James (talk) 12:48, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Journal of Discourses

You should discuss it on the article's talk page - the editors removing the link have provided reasons based on policies and guidelines (External links and Reliable sources) in edit summaries, "looks like" isn't a sufficient reason to say the link is reliable. Peter James (talk) 12:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Journal of Discourses. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 72Dino (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]