User talk:M.s.w.lee
| This user is a student editor in Washington_University_in_St_Louis/Behavioral_Ecology_(Fall_2020) . |
M.s.w.lee, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi M.s.w.lee! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, M.s.w.lee, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cyrtophora citricola
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyrtophora citricola you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MeegsC -- MeegsC (talk) 17:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cyrtophora citricola
[edit]The article Cyrtophora citricola you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cyrtophora citricola for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MeegsC -- MeegsC (talk) 12:00, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
M.s.w.lee, I'm very sorry you've had to wait so long for action on your GA nomination. I am prepared to have the review treated as abandoned, and put the nomination back into the pool of unreviewed nominations while retaining its seniority, which would make it the oldest unreviewed nomination and therefore likely to be picked up by a new reviewer within a couple of weeks.
If you're still around and want me to proceed, I'll do so. Please let me know. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:33, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey BlueMoonset, I am still around and would appreciate that! M.s.w.lee (talk)
- Thanks for your response, M.s.w.lee. I have just put the nomination back into the pool of unreviewed nominations while retaining its seniority. I hope it is picked up soon. Best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- And look at that, someone picked it up! If you're still interested, I will be working on this over the next several days. I hope have an initial read-through done in a few days, and then we can address comments, with the goal of closing in a week or two. You will likely get a bot notice soon that the review has been taken by me. -Pax Verbum 22:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hey Pax85, Thanks for picking up the review, I appreciate it! M.s.w.lee (talk) 02:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I have started the review and leaving comments over on the new page. Feel free to take a look at your convenience. Cheers! -Pax Verbum 06:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hey Pax85, Thanks for picking up the review, I appreciate it! M.s.w.lee (talk) 02:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- And look at that, someone picked it up! If you're still interested, I will be working on this over the next several days. I hope have an initial read-through done in a few days, and then we can address comments, with the goal of closing in a week or two. You will likely get a bot notice soon that the review has been taken by me. -Pax Verbum 22:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi again, M.s.w.lee! I have completed my read-through and rated almost every section. There are a couple of notes for the references and a few sentences I would like you to review in the body. You can find the comments on the review page. Overall the article was quite informative and I see no issue with it being promoted to GA after you take a look at those comments. I will wait 7 days from this message to finalize the review; it is on my watch list, so feel free to ask any questions or bring up any concerns. Thank you for your good work! -Pax Verbum 06:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Hey Pax85! Thanks again for reviewing the article. I will make these changes and get back to you soon! M.s.w.lee (talk) 16:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Looks like all of the issues have been addressed. Good work! I am promoting the article now. Congratulations! -Pax Verbum 20:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cyrtophora citricola
[edit]The article Cyrtophora citricola you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Cyrtophora citricola for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pax85 -- Pax85 (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]
Congratulations on seeing that article through a really long GA process!