Jump to content

User talk:M.Caban/Edit Wikipedia Work design

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:M.Caban
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good length
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition I think you may need to add the 's after "consist" where you wrote: "Herzberg theory consist..." Other than that, everything is good!
Other comments Good Job!

Joselv83 (talk) 03:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:CRamel16
Date of review 05/06/2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/07/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/07/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Perfect length
Image (needed/appropriate) no image
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) The information is relevant.
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) yes
Wikiformatting used bullet points.
Grammar & composition Good Work
Other comments use external links for extra credits

CRamel16 (talk) 23:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Nikicia
Date of review May 7, 2013
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page May 7, 2013
Date review submitted to instructor May 7, 2013
Length of edit (too long/too short) Length is appropriate
Image (needed/appropriate) Not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Article is accurate and relevant to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting bullets used
Grammar & composition Good
Other comments

Nikicia (talk) 08:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:Xyzbb1253
Date of review 5/7/13
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/7/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/7/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Meets the requirement
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Information was sourced from the textbook
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Information is related to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting Neutral point of view, bullets and number are aligned
Grammar & composition Grammar is good, numbering and bullets are fine
Other comments None
Reviewer's Signature Xyzbb1253 (talk) 09:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Name of student reviewer Trinirebel
Date of review 5/7/13
Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User:M.Caban
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Work_design
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 5/7/13
Date review submitted to instructor 5/7/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate length
Image (needed/appropriate) None applicable for this edit
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Information was sourced from the textbook
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Information is related to I/O Psychology
Wikiformatting bullets and number are aligned, exemplary formatting
Grammar & composition Error free
Other comments Note worthy edit!
Reviewer's Signature Trinirebel (talk) 03:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]