User talk:Lusouser

I was blocked from editing Wikipedia with the argument that I attack user-administrator Bearcat. That’s false. In fact, I’m defending myself against systematic and furious Bearcat’s attacks. I have no other way to defend myself. He not only intends to delete my personal page but also new pages I have created.

None can understand why my personal page was deleted after about TWO YEARS of existence in Wikipedia.

The docufiction article in Wikipedia (created March 8, 2008), with a very few adjustments, is the same ever since in multiple languages. The same goes with ethnofiction (created March 13, 2008). Year after year, the word docufiction started to be used by scholars, film critics, journalists, etc. everywhere. Nowadays is a universal term referring to a hybrid of fact and fiction, either in cinema or literature. The concept of frontier is crucial to its correct definition.

For Bearcat all this is “bullshit”. What can we do against such unconsciousness?

PLEASE NOTE : Above all, I feel humiliated for having been forced to open new user accounts each time when one of them was blocked by Bearcat. If I had not done so, the articles I created and many other related ones which I improved wouldn’t be kept at present.

Firstly, I was not responsible for the blocking of any of your accounts. Not a single solitary one of your past accounts was ever blocked by me, and not a single one of them was ever blocked without cause: Wikipedia has rules, you have repeatedly violated them, that has consequences, and I was not the person who blocked you. I also have nothing whatsoever to do with your getting blocked on the Portuguese Wikipedia, either: they did that for their own reasons based on your behaviour there, not because of anything that had anything to do with me.

Secondly, Wikipedia does not owe you or your films articles. To establish that you qualify for coverage in Wikipedia, there are several conditions that have to be met, and these have already been explained to you on several occasions: (a) you must meet a defined notability criterion, and are not automatically entitled to have an article just because you exist; (b) the articles must be referenced to reliable source coverage in media, and may not be referenced to your own self-published essays about your own work in your own webspace as a substitute for media coverage; (c) the articles must be written in a neutral point of view, and not as advertisements; and (d) you are not allowed to write the articles yourself, because of our conflict of interest rules.

Thirdly, the reason the docufiction article is "the same" across multiple languages is not that your version represented properly referenced quality content; it's that you put it there yourself and then editwarred over it every time anybody took issue with all the original research. And again, I was not the first person to raise an issue with it; you just reinserted it yourself everytime anybody tried to challenge you on it.

I don't, incidentally, lack consciousness. You can trust me on this: you have never had a thought cross your mind in your lifetime, and never will have a thought cross your mind for the remainder of your lifetime, that somehow surpasses my ability to understand. You think you're my intellectual superior? Trust me on this: you are not. Bearcat (talk) 03:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Mists, from its old location at User:Lusouser/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 23:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Drifts (film), from its old location at User:Lusouser/Drifts (film). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ricardo Costa (filmmaker)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ricardo Costa (filmmaker) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 11:19, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Kudpung. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. This concerns your comments about Bearcat. Do it again and you may find your activity on Wikipedia curtailed without further warning. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:24, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Kudpung

Hello, Lusouser. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 22:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian. This is your final warning for incivility/harassment. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:57, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to make false claims about Bearcat's use of his admin tools, I will extend your block and withdraw your talk page access. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]