User talk:Lupus648

...

Your edits

Hi, and thanks for your contributions. I noticed that you linked some dates recently. This practice is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an Arbcom restriction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements, although this is no suggestion from me that you are in breach whatsoever. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, many thanks for your hint, I thought this was common practice. The linking of dates without a special importance (e.g. maybe "1968") is indeed not very useful. Lupus648 (talk) 16:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was common practice until recently. Anyway, happy editing! Dabomb87 (talk) 16:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Lupus648! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dabomb87 (talk) 16:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of Lithuanian Union of Russians

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lithuanian Union of Russians, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This is duplication: see Union of the Russians of Lithuania. The other article is older (see history); so I'd support deleting and/or redirecting the new one to the stub with longer page history.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Miacek (t) 10:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to draw your attention to this

I have opened a discussion here to which I wish to draw your attention. This is a friendly notice under the auspices of WP:CANVASS. Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 03:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, nice to see that there are new users interested in the same field that I am. I think you might consider adding something about you on your userpage. Usually, people add a babel box (languages they speak), or just drop a few words about themselves. Best regards, --Miacek (t) 20:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Miacek, many thanks for your kind message. It is indeed very nice to meet users with the same interests. A small user page is more or less in progress, but for now it is of less importance for me. I wish to draw your attention to this: Talk:Just Russia. I don't want to reverse your last edit about the ideology of Just Russia, nevertheless - for me - it seems to be a little bit problematical. Best regards.Lupus648 (talk) 20:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Loss of referenced data

Hello, in this edit you deleted a large amount of referenced data, I dont see any discussion or consensus on this, http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=List_of_political_parties_in_Kosovo&direction=next&oldid=425425574 please, can you explain? thanks, mike

Hi Mike, the original list of political parties was an indiscriminate collection of data, it - so I think - did not fit to Wikipedia standards. Relevant parties and micro parties (that partly did not contest any election) were confusingly mixed. I split the list into major/minor/Serbian and minority parties and deleted the almost irrelevant micro parties. This micro parties were neither explained nor had an own article (they were "linked" but the links were only useless redirects to the main list). Relevant referenced data did not disappear. Nevertheless I recently added some of the small minority parties that at least contested the 2010 election. Best regards, Lupus648 (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moldovan parliamentary election, 2009 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. When you recently edited Croatian Christian Democratic Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivan Cesar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Award

		Ukraine Barnstar
		I give you this Ukraine Barnstar for writing Peasant Party of Ukraine! Usually it is me who creates articles about Ukrainian political parties and it is nice to know I do not WP:OWN this subject. 2 know more then 1! Also thanks for the news that the Socialist Party of Ukraine was kicked out of the Socialist International; 2 miss less news then 1! — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks :-) Lupus648 (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/PDS

Template:German politics/party colours/PDS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/REP

Template:German politics/party colours/REP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/SSW

Template:German politics/party colours/SSW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]