User talk:Lupin/Archive 13

Archive: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Image:Neuchatel_dot.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Neuchatel_dot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 14:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Firenze_dot.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Firenze_dot.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 17:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:High_Wycombe_-_Buckinghamshire_dot.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:High_Wycombe_-_Buckinghamshire_dot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eddie ^{(talk/contribs)} 18:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Dunkerque dot.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Dunkerque dot.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Dunkerque dot.png|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 17:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Dunkerque dot.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Dunkerque dot.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:Dunkerque dot.png|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 19:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

minor bug in redirected pages

In popup of a redirect, the target article's history etc. popup does not pops up. Example if i point to WP:RS, it shows redirects to Wikipedia:Reliable Sources(Even in non-dev version). In all menu items of target article(Wikipedia:Reliable Sources) popups does not pop up. Not so important, do it at leisure. Nice day. Lara_bran 09:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

minorIssue#2:In "popups" dropdown menu, include "about" below "disable popups", which should link to WP:POP. Lara_bran 14:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

minorIssue#3:showpreviewbutton.onmouseover function() {} should have extra command(first command) as showpreviewbutton.backgroundcolor=differentcolor. So that we can rest assured that download functions are called. Thanks. Lara_bran 05:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, the first of your bugs should now be fixed in the dev version. Lupin|talk|popups 13:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Actually we want history of target page of a redirect, donno how this bug survived from being zapped, for this long. Thanks for all the work. Lara_bran 03:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

minorIssue#4: Window.onClose = popupsDropdownmenu.reset() please. This is because, even if i close a tab in firefox, it saves all cache for "undo close tab" option. Some 10 tabs it(firefox) saves for this purpose and firefox slowed down a little. Thanks. Lara_bran 06:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Popups suggestion

Have you considered adding a link to Special:Deletedcontributions within the admin version of popups? Still fairly new, I believe, but I find myself using it more and more frequently. - auburnpilot talk 20:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, this in now in the dev version. Lupin|talk|popups 13:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Quick Question

In the scripts that I have been using, there is a "use non-admin rollback" checkbox. I was wondering if you could tell me the difference between admin rollback and non-admin rollback. --דניאל - Danielrocks123 20:08, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Admin rollback is faster and easier on the servers, but you need to be an admin to use it. Prodego ^talk 18:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Help with disambig fixing via popups

Hi, was wondering how I would enable disambig linking via popups with the monobook script I have. I know you have to add popupFixDabs=true; but I don't understand where. i've been reading through you're help pages but they don't seem to mention where to add it. I would also like it, so I wouldn't have to preview the edit first, or am I being a bit thick, and this option (popupRedirAutoClick) is nothing to do with the disambig fixing :-/
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. -- Halo2 ^Talk 01:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I took the liberty of adding it for you. HTH --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, but it doesn't work properly. There's an explanation here. -- Halo2 ^Talk 13:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I contacted the creator of the WikEd script, he said it might have something to do with this. The whole conversation is here. Could you shed any light on it? -- Halo2 ^Talk 21:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey Lupin: I could add something that turns off wikEd if an edit page is opened automatically by your script, but I have no idea how your script works. It could probably be an URL parameter or a global variable. Any ideas? Cacycle 02:17, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Consult

I've written my script in my monobook page but I can't continue because I'm not very good at programming can you help me to finish it because I nearly get there but it doesn't work. Thank you very much. PS. I use Internet Explorer 7.0 and Mozilla Firefox but both doesn't work (OS:Windows XP Service Pack 2).--Passawuth 07:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

An interesting revert

As about five of us were all trying to fix page move vandalism last night (and tripping over each other, and possibly causing one of the two db locks) I tried reverting to the last good version of one of the pages with your script. Much to my surprise... I somehow reverted to the deleted diff text, not the edit by Mattva01. Have you seen this before? Picaroon (t) 19:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Your vandal tool

Is there a way to warn someone with one click of the mouse using your tool? --MKnight9989 12:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

No. Lupin|talk|popups 21:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Admin rollback problem in Lupin tool

Hi. FYI, it appears some of the generated HTML has changed in the Last revision page so the admin rollback is broken. It looks like a <br /> was removed and replaced by spans with classes. I mostly fixed it by changing the regex as seen here but now, if someone else has already reverted, the Javascript message doesn't show their revert summary. I can look further into that later (and after I find a better Javascript regex testing tool) but at least the rollback link itself works. —Wknight94 (talk) 16:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Javascript/Template question

I thought you might have an answer to this. Is there a template that I can use that when placed on a page converts into the articles name? for instance if I put {{Page}}(an example) it would automatically convert into the name of the article which it's placed on? Does such a thing exist? If not, What javascript would be required to make such a script possible to create such a template? Wikidudeman ^(talk) 19:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Use {{PAGENAME}}. Cacycle 02:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

I've haven't met you but, you deserve this:

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I, User:Sunny910910, award you this Barnstar for your continuious work, on editing and creation of JavaScripts Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions)Neither will alone, nor strenght alone 02:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Someone Told Me You Could Help

Karmafist, when he was not banned, put something that he said came from you in my monobook entry. I wanted something that could be made to scan a set of dictionarys, references, thumbnail sketches when I dwelled over a word and provide a small window that would vanish when I went to the next word. All he put in there was a translation of the english to spanish. I don't know where to go to modify this because the monobook entry for my name appears to be empty. Can you help me a bit? Thanks. Johnor 02:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

It is empty because you blanked it :) Prodego ^talk 02:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, er ok I blanked it, but it is still displaying a translation in spanish everytime I dwell over a word. I want it to find a brief dictionary or geographical location image of the item if I dwell over it. Can anyone guide me a bit on this. I can do a bit of programming but I don't know where to begin.Johnor 05:38, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, I'll be hornswoggled! It was Google translator switch which I had turned on inadvertently long ago that kept translating my English into Spanish. However, I'd still like to have at least a definition of a word that I dwell over. Can anyone help me with that please :)Johnor 06:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Popup persistent toggle switch

For a long time I've been looking for a way to disable the popups beyond the current page. I've searched through the options but haven't found one that does this. So I've made a small script that use a cookie to store the current status of the popup script (on/off). A link with a form checkbox is added to one of the portlets.
I haven't found a way to re-enable popups after disablePopups() has been called, so instead I've chosen to modify a variable used by popupsReady().
see http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Marc.B/popup-chkbox.js
So far the only minor disadvantage is that "natural" tooltips aren't restored on links where a popup was shown.
Marc.B from wikipedia FR —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.241.135.6 (talk) 12:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Request for SVG version of image

I'd like to ask for a SVG version of your St John's College shield image, to replace the existing PNG version, as per WP:PIFU#Use_SVG_over_PNG. This should be simple if the image is already a vector version in Inkscape. Thanks XLerate 12:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

SVG version of the Newnham College crest would be useful also M0ffx (talk) 10:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ferret.png

I noticed this image has an out-of-date PD tag and the source is no longer there. Are you able to give a more specific definition of why this work is in the public domain? It is currently in use on the weasel-words template and it looks kinda bad to have no justification for the status. GreenReaper 19:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		That counter-vandalism thing is an awesome tool, so you deserve this Barnstar for helping Wikipedia fight vandalism and letting others fight vandalism! Congratulations! Regards, HyperSonicBoom 03:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Germany_berlin.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Germany_berlin.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 04:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for making such a great anti-vandalism tool. It just makes dealing with vandalism so much easier. It also gives users a better chance to get an anti-vandalism barnstar. MacMad (talk · contribs)  15:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

In fact, you also deserve a SLIVER WIKI AWARD!

Anti-Vandalism Tool

When I try to use it on my Windows 98, the tools appear in my toolbox as usual. But when I go to use the tools, the tools from your anti-vandal thing are gone until I try to save the monobook page again. I have reloaded my cache and everything but it's still not working. Help please. Concrete Complex 15:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Anti-vandal tool admin rollback broken?

The admin rollback button seems to be broken. It says it couldn't find the rollback link when I try to rollback anything. Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Brajlo.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brajlo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Laura_fraser.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Laura_fraser.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 23:17, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Installing popups on another wiki

Hi, Lupin. I am interested in using your popups on BhamWiki. What questions should I ask first in order to guess whether it will work? The wiki uses monobook. Can I just install the code in monobook.js, or is there something the server admin needs to do first? Thanks. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 23:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

This is more or less a FAQ. Lupin|talk|popups 21:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Template:DD

Hi, I just noticed that a template you created, Template:DD, is unused and appears to be abandoned. I've marked it as deprecated, meaning it'll be deleted in two weeks' time if nobody objects. If there's a reason to keep it please leave a note at Wikipedia talk:Deprecated and orphaned templates and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. Thanks. Bryan Derksen 03:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Signature

Someone pointed out User:Lupin/sig. Substituted signatures like this are frowned upon, since anyone can vandalize them at any time (see WP:SIG#Transclusion_of_templates). It looks like your signature would fit just fine into the 255 character limit in your user preferences. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, this is a historical relic. I do have the sig in my preferences. Lupin|talk|popups 21:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

AVT problem?

Hi Lupin, I'm a huge fan of your anti vandal tool, but something appears amiss... it appears to be only picking up punctuation related edits. I tried control shift R to no avail. Is something wrong with the badwords script? Thanks so much for a great tool! All the best, ~Eliz81^(C) 06:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I looked through the badwords list and didn't see anything that might have caused the problem. I thought at first that someone had vandalized the list to make the tool less useful, but I didn't see any entries that would obviously cause this problem. I don't know much about the syntax of the badwords list, so I can't fix it. Is it a problem with the tool? Somebody Else's Problem^{(aka Alethiophile)Ask me why} 23:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

The tool appears to be functioning as normal, except that now in the feed where it says Article name matched X, instead of X ever being offensive words, it's either a single character repeated, or -, >, |, etc. It does seem as if '>' might be substituting for an offensive word that then gets displayed when you open the diff, but I'm still a bit confused at this change. ~Eliz81^(C) 00:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

It also flags the open square bracket, [, and so all recent edits that dealt with wikilinks are flagged. Somebody Else's Problem^{(aka Alethiophile)Ask me why} 02:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't seem to be a problem with the list - I tried reverting the list to an old version to be sure, and it didn't help. :-( Hoping this can be sorted out, as I think the tool's great. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 18:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

(outdent)UPDATE:The problem has been fixed. ~Eliz81^(C) 03:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm having a popups problem

I'm havin' a problem with the pop ups...I can't get them to work. I do everything that is says, I turn off my pop-up blocker and still nothin'!!! HELP!!!!! --Crash Underride 18:17, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

What browser are you using? Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 20:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Internet Explorer for Windows XP Home Edition --Crash Underride 18:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Internet Explorer support for most of the JS tools on Wikipedia is shaky at best. My suggestion would be to try Mozilla Firefox. Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 18:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I may have to try that. Thank Mr. Vulcan.--Crash Underride 18:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I believe they are supposed to work in IE, but versions and individual user settings sometimes mess them up. Using Firefox is just easier. Two years of Firefox and not looking back! Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 23:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

"No rollback link found."

I can't rollback anything, I could do the non-admin thing, but I would prefer not to load more javascript. - RoyBoy ⁸⁰⁰ 02:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Lupin is out of the office

Lupin has not edited since 5 September. Please be aware that you may not get a reply to messages left here fro some time. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 19:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Roleplaying sympathizer

Any idea if this was meant to be you (User:Lupin) instead of Lupin? Since it was an IP edit, I can't tell what it was supposed to be. Cheers! -- JHunterJ 02:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Dunno, nothing to do with me :-) Lupin|talk|popups 21:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue

Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Time because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:28, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue

Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Get Page Name because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 01:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of User:Lupin/sig

User:Lupin/sig has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Coastergeekperson04 03:08, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

No content in Category:Jazz Bassists

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Jazz Bassists, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Jazz Bassists has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Jazz Bassists, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 18:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

You've probably heard this so many times already but... thanks for the popups! --wj32 ^{talk | contribs} 09:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

You should hear it at least a million times more. Popups and Recent IP Changes are absolutely amazing. Thanks so much! JackSchmidt 20:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

article history popup

Whenever i visit some article in wikipedia, i wish to give a brief look at the article's history. I have to middle-click history tab for that now, which is cumbersome. I have nav-popups installed, can you change code so that a popup will come up to display history of the particular page im visiting? Like when i point the cursor on history tab button at top (of the article/talk-page im viewing), a popup showing history of that article should pop-up. Thanks in advance. Bista^map 08:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

You can already do this - set popupOnlyArticleLinks=false and then try hovering over a tab. Lupin|talk|popups 21:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Do you need my help in archiving your talk page? :) If you incorporate dev version to main, change 2 defaults please - popupOnlyArticleLinks=false and popupPreviewButtonEvent='mouseover'. Bista^map 06:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Forking Popups for Citizendium - do you mind?

I am working on forking the pop-ups for Citizendium, specifically because we use a different URL structure (wiki?... as opposed to index.php?...), but also to personalize it for the site. I was under the impression based on talkpage for popup.js that you intend to license it under a "free" license. If you object, or if I'm mistaken about that licensing, please let me know, and I'll trash what I've done. Thanks --ZachPruckowski 05:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

No, go ahead. Let me know if you add any cool features :-) Lupin|talk|popups 19:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Please archive your talk page

Please archive your talk page. --Foggy Morning 02:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello there.

I'm currently using your "filter recent changes" tool, and I noticed that clicking one of the 'test' buttons doesn't do anything except lead you to the person's talk page. I was wondering if there's any way to implement a way of just having to click a test template, with the code filling in the vandalized article's name and all? Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 02:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and I'm using Internet Explorer 6. Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 02:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

When i hit the test button, it automatically comes up with {{subst:uw-test1|(article name already inserted)}} ~~~~ so i just have to hit save, i'm using firefox, so not sure if that makes a difference or not Ctjf83 03:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Personalizing

is there any way to personalize lupin...such as i'd like it when i hit the vand. warning button for it to use {{subst:uw-vandalism2|Article}} instead of what it uses, and the edit summary for that to say, "vandalism warning!" so i can find them easier for myself, on my contributions page, and instead of the page summary saying "(Reverted edits by (name) to last version by (name)) can i make it say "rv vandalism" Ctjf83 03:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Short of making your own copy of the script and altering it, the answer for now is "no". Sorry! Lupin|talk|popups 19:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Popups appear transparent in Konqueror and sometimes also in Safari

When using Konqueror 3.5.5 on KDE 3.5.5 and sometimes when using Safari 3 for Windows, the popups appear transparent; they have no background and mix up with the article text, themselves and other popus in a very messy way. They also don't seem to react to mouse events, so you can't get rid of them when they appear. Shinobu (talk) 09:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

This is typically caused by the popups css file failing to load. I don't know why this might happen, though. I have changed the way this css file is called in the dev version, so you might like to see if using that fixes your problems. Lupin|talk|popups 19:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

I am using the dev version, and I also bypassed the cache before I left the message above. Maybe I'll have a look, but I can't guarantee I can find anything of course. Bye, Shinobu (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I've done some digging; I'll post it here in case it's any use to you.

... other user scripts ... .js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></SCRIPT>
<SCRIPT src="/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/popupsdev.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></SCRIPT>
<LINK rel="stylesheet" href="data:text/css,@import%20url%28%27%20http%3A//wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php%3Ftitle%3DUser%3ALupin/navpopdev.css%26action%3Draw%26ctype%3Dtext/css%26dontcountme%3Ds%20%27%29%3B">
<SCRIPT src="/w/index.php?title=User: ... other user script ...

This is the relevant bit of what gets injected in the HTML source by scripts; the linebreaks were inserted by me for clarity. Konqueror seems to convert the href of the link-tag to an embedded style with an import rule on parsing.(see below) The escaped string represents:

data:text/css,@import url(' http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/navpopdev.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css&dontcountme=s ');

I don't know how the spaces (%20) got in there, nor do I know if it's important.(see below) As far as I can tell the url is accessible and points to the correct stylesheet.

The following stylesheets turn up in document.styleSheets:

document.styleSheets[0].cssRules[0].href
    /skins-1.5/common/shared.css?101
document.styleSheets[1].cssRules[0].selectorText
    a.stub, a.new
  document.styleSheets[1].cssRules[0].style.cssText
    color: #ba0000; text-decoration: none; 
document.styleSheets[2].cssRules[0].selectorText
    #column-content
  document.styleSheets[2].cssRules[0].style.cssText
    margin-left: 0px; 
document.styleSheets[3].cssRules[0].href
    /w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Common.css&usemsgcache=yes&action=raw&ctype=text/css&smaxage=2678400
document.styleSheets[4].cssRules[0].selectorText
    .portlet, #p-cactions, #p-personal
  document.styleSheets[4].cssRules[0].style.cssText
    float: left; width: auto; height: auto; overflow: visible; position: relative; z-index: auto !important; left: auto; top: auto; text-align: center; line-height: normal; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0.5em; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0.5em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 100%; white-space: nowrap; border-collapse: separate; 
document.styleSheets[5].cssRules[0].selectorText
    .portlet .pBody, #p-cactions .pBody, #p-personal .pBody
  document.styleSheets[5].cssRules[0].style.cssText
    background-image: url(http://wiki.riteme.site/skins-1.5/monobook/headbg.jpg); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-attachment: initial; background-position-x: 0px; background-position-y: 0px; -khtml-background-clip: initial; -khtml-background-origin: initial; background-color: #f9f9f9; border-top-width: 1px; border-right-width: 1px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-left-width: 1px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; border-top-color: #c0c0c0; border-right-color: #c0c0c0; border-bottom-color: #c0c0c0; border-left-color: #c0c0c0; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; 
document.styleSheets[6].cssRules[0].selectorText
    span.GerbrantEditRegexReplaceHit
  document.styleSheets[6].cssRules[0].style.cssText
    font-weight: bold; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-position-x: initial; background-position-y: initial; -khtml-background-clip: initial; -khtml-background-origin: initial; background-color: #b0c4de; 
document.styleSheets[7].cssRules[0].href
     http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/navpopdev.css&action=raw&ctype=text/css&dontcountme=s 
document.styleSheets[8].cssRules[0].selectorText
    #siteNoticeBig
  document.styleSheets[8].cssRules[0].style.cssText
    display: none; 
document.styleSheets[9].cssRules[0].selectorText
    #siteNotice
  document.styleSheets[9].cssRules[0].style.cssText
    text-align: left; text-decoration: none; margin-top: 1em; 

All stylesheets accounted for, including navpopdev.css at index 7, but again note the spaces.

document.styleSheets[7].cssRules[0].styleSheet.cssRules.length
    0

I think that last one is a bad omen. Shinobu (talk) 13:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

If I add the following to the start of my monobook.js:

document.write('<LINK rel="stylesheet" href="data:text/css,@import%20url%28%27http%3A//wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php%3Ftitle%3DUser%3ALupin/navpopdev.css%26action%3Draw%26ctype%3Dtext/css%26dontcountme%3Ds%27%29%3B">');

And click "Preview", the popus work. If I comment it and click "Preview" they don't. If I uncomment it and click "Preview" they work again.

document.write('<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="' +
		       'http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/navpop.css' +
		       '&action=raw&ctype=text/css&dontcountme=s">');

Works too. And at this point it dawned upon me that I had been looking at an older version of popups.js all along :-) You apparently changed the document.write to a createElement and inserted the spaces yourself:

var styles = "@import url(' " + popStyleSheet + " ');";

Those spaces are obviously causing the problem. By the way, the edit summary for the change was: "avoid document.write for stylesheet, hopefully fixing odd bug" - out of curiosity... what bug was this? Shinobu (talk) 15:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Great, thanks for the detective work! I've removed the spaces from the dev version, so hopefully that'll work now. The odd bug was that the stuff I was document.write'ing sometimes ended up in the edit box, so it then appeared in the article. For example, see [1]. Hmm, I should really think about making the dev version current.... Lupin|talk|popups 21:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Rollback

It used to be that when I hit rollback, it would immediately rollback the page. Recently it has taken me to the diff page and I have had to hit rollback from there. Do you know what the issue is? I am using TW with Lupin.--Jab843 (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

I am having the same issue, and I am using non-admin rollback. I am using firefox. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk) 22:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

When I'm monitoring the the recent IP edits, I click "rollback" to effect a non-admin rollback, but instead of reverting I get a new window with the diff showing. This also occurs if I click "history" or "last" or even the name of the article itself. I do have "Use non-admin rollback" checked and I haven't changed any settings anywhere since I last used the Anti-vandal tool successfully. ... discospinster _talk 03:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

• I can confirm this one. Roll-back simply takes me to the diff instead of rolling back automatically. Similar to the previous user i didnt change any settings, and it appears that the lupin scripts havent been updated today. Perhaps this is a wikipedia problem? (EG: Preventing malicious rollback?) --Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 07:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

It's not just the revert button. Also the (last) and (hist) options take you to the highlighted diff, instead of either the most recent edit or the article history. I think something's wrong with the tool. ~Eliz81^(C) 07:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Rollback Temporal fix (NON OFFICIAL!)

Ok, for everyone here who has this problem, there is a Temporal Fix available(Non official though!). Out colleague reverter Philip Trueman uses a modified version of Lupin, which can be found here: User:Philip_Trueman/recent2.js. This versions rollback button still functions as intended, along with the other buttons. Philip notes that his version might contain bugs and might not always work, but so far i have encountered nothing that prevented me from reverting. It might not be a perfect solution, but at least it works.

One little addition: don't go bugging Philip if you find bugs. He doesnt know its posted here, and remember that usage is at your own risk, so no complaints either please! --Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 08:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that, Excirial. My version also stopped working yesterday - it looks as though the RSS feed for Special:Recentchanges now puts some extra stuff on the end of the string holding the article title, and that was feeding in to the URLs for rollback and so forth. It took me a while to sort it out.

This is not the first time this sort of thing has happened. Can anyone say where the developers document functional changes like these? I think we should have been told in advance.

Lupin is of course welcome to help himself to my code if he wishes. In the meantime, I'm happy for anyone who wishes to use my version. Constructive criticism at User talk:Philip Trueman/PILT please. Philip Trueman (talk) 11:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks all! I've tried to incorporate Philip's fixes into my version, so it should now work again. Lupin|talk|popups 17:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Deirdrekenfight.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Deirdrekenfight.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphim ^Whipp 17:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi there. Right now I'm going through a bunch of images that have no fair use rationales and I am tagging them as such. It seems that you didn't upload the images but made an improvement to them. Would you prefer that I notified you of the image tag or the previous uploader?

Best, Seraphim ^Whipp 18:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Anonymous contributions on others wikis

Hi Lupin,

On wikipedia in Catalan, we use translation for special namespace, and popups can not show the IP contributions in ca:Special:Recentchanges. I can remark it in Wikipedia in German, Italian, Polish (and I think there are more) too.

I have found a little solution modifying the regex. You can see my changes. I would know if you can apply it on your module. Pasqual (ca) · CUT 20:05, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for my poor English Pasqual (ca) · CUT 20:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't know if you understand me, and I try to correct my first messege. Pasqual (ca) · CUT 00:38, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikinfo

Fred Bauder just upgraded Wikinfo to mediawiki 1.11.1. I thought it would be nice to have popups over there, so I wanted to check with you about it. I'm not a java scripter, but it seems that it would be as simple as copying popups.js over there, and importing it into a monobook file, and seeing if it works. Is that something you would want to do, or would you have a problem if I tried it? I assume the script is GFDL licensed, but I would want to give proper attribution to you. If it works, keeping it up to date would be a consideration as well. Your thoughts? - Crockspot (talk) 04:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

• I ran a test: Copied popups.js to User:Crockspot/popups.js on Wikinfo, created a monobook.js file with the same import code as used here (substituting Crockspot for Lupin), flushed my cache, and the test failed. No functionality at all. But you probably already knew that would happen. Let me know if you have any suggestions. - Crockspot (talk) 03:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

• I noticed I was missing navpops.css, so I copied that into my user space as well, and made a couple of pointer adjustments to the popups script, but it still fails. There are a lot of wikipedia links within the code, and I'm just a hack, so I can't really go any further. - Crockspot (talk) 03:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

This is covered in the FAQ. Please try linking directly to the unchanged wikipedia script as advised there, but be sure to customize the appropriate variables. I note that wikinfo does not seem to have query.php, so you ought to be able to get reduced but still quite workable functionality. Lupin|talk|popups 07:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! - Crockspot (talk) 04:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Minor fixing...

Hello Lupin, I just realize you edited your anti-vandal tool at User:Lupin/recent2.js. I want to let you know that your updates may not work in IE7 (or previous versions) because I currently use that browser. It may affect many people who use your tools, so can you modify the script to make it IE compatible? PrestonH 01:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I haven't tested in IE lately (this is tricky for me), but the latest changes were, I believe, somewhat innocuous. Please let me know if this problem goes away by itself or needs further attentions. Lupin|talk|popups 07:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

It's working again. I probably forgot to bypass my cache or it went away by itself. Thanks for your help Lupin. PrestonH 17:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Filter recent changes not working

Ths filter recent changes tool does not show any edits up. Is it not working? (I'm using firefox). KillerGorillaV (Talk) 02:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Curious, it should be. It does work for me. Let me know if this problem persists. Lupin|talk|popups 07:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Having a similar problem since last week. The "Show details" switch does not work. Tested in Opera, Firefox and IE. Even tried a modified version from User:Philip_Trueman/recent2.js. Still no luck. Think outside the box 13:23, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Spamprotectiontext

I was just updating this as part a series to help reduce reports on meta: that must be handled here locally. Didn't notice until after I updated it that you recently made changes to it. Not trying to wheel with you over anything, please take a look at the current version and let me know if you think it needs more updates (less confusing on the editors if it doesn't change every day!). Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 02:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I think this is an improvement on my version (I was just trying to fix it, as it confused me recently). Lupin|talk|popups 00:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello! - about your Popups

Hi there! I just started using this really nice "software" and found a minor problem: when I hover onto article names, it dosen't display as this image: , that is, it does not show "actions" on the side of the article name, but as the following: [article name]lastEdit|lastContrib|sinceMe|edit-history-un|watch-talk|edit|new|whatLinksHere-related Changes-move
I would like to know that if this is normal or not. If it is not normal, do you have a solution? Thank you!-- Vintei  talk  21:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

It is normal in browsers which I believe are not able to display the menus as in that screenshot. The canonical solution is to use Firefox. Lupin|talk|popups 00:16, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi and there is another problem. When I hover over an image, it reads "image preview failed. install query.php" or something similar, but with the query.php stuff (I can still see the image though). I'm using Firefox 2.0.0.9. How to solve the problem? Thank you!-- Vintei  talk  01:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

The query.php thing appears for everyone here. I, too, can see the image thumbnails, just without any page preview. It appears that something changed with query.php and Popups hasn't been updated yet. Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 06:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

possible bug with pop-ups (disambiguation)

There appears to be a bug with the pop-ups' disambiguation feature. At times, it will disambiguate incorrect links as well as the ones I'm trying to fix. For example, in this edit, it changed the graph coloring link, which was not supposed to happen. Please look into this.

Thanks. --Ixfd64 22:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Feature bloat

Popups have just gotten to big and slow for me, so I had to remove them. Do you have a simple compact version. All I'd want is the page preview box when I hover over a page link, the top 20 contribs when I hover over user links, add diffs shown on diff link hover. Voice-of-All 21:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Gadget

Lupin, Your popups script has the honor of being the first Gadget on en: There is an outstanding question regardin the css needs at MediaWiki talk:Gadgets-definition if you have a moment. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 03:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Small Popups feature request

Hi, Lupin! I just have one small request for Popups. It would help greatly if Popups would determine if the "Newer revision" in a diff link is the current one, and say so if it is. That would be extremely useful in conjunction with tools such as Twinkle. I'm not sure where you prefer to have Popups-related discussion, but I figured I'd ask here so you get that nice yellow bar. ;) I'll be watching this page for a response; feel free to decline if it's too hard or you don't have the time. Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 00:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Fixing misspelling redirects

I have requested that the idea of using popups to specifically fix misspelling redirects be revisited on the Navigation Popups talk page. -- BullWikiWinkle 22:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays Lupin/Archive 13. Have a Happy New Year !

^{Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C)}

18:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Wishing you the very best for the season - Guettarda 05:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion for filtering

Can I suggest that there should be a new switch for the filter to ignore a set of sexual words (bondage/lesbian etc) for biogs categorised in various sexual categories, such as those referring to porn? That'd take care of a lot of false results. And if it doesn't already, conversely, it should filter for the addition of such cats to biogs, which would help with WP:BLP monitoring. --Dweller (talk) 10:31, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Launch pop-ups on key command?

I really enjoy your popups tool -- thanks so much for making it available -- but I do encounter two problems with it: 1) it often pops up when I don't want it to, which is annoying, and 2) when I do want it to pop up it takes too long. I thought both of these could be solved with one new feature: a setting where you press a key to cause the pop up. If it was set, no pop ups would appear unless you moused over something and pressed a key (maybe ctrl?). That way, pop ups would never appear by accident and you could cause them to come up as fast as you could hit the control key.

I don't think this should be too hard to implement, just replace the current mouseover/timer set up with an onKeyDown thing. In any event, I hope you'll consider it and thanks again for the great tool! AaronSw (talk) 18:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Problem with toolbox

Lupin i've recently been using your Live Spellchecker, and for some reason it's vanished from my toolbox under the search bar, is there anyway of fixing this problem. →Yun-Yuuzhan→ 16:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh and i'm using Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.11 the latest Firefox version. →Yun-Yuuzhan→ 16:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

AntiVandal Tool bug

Image:Lupin problem.jpg was taken by User:Snowolf, but I'm getting the same problem; the tool still works, 'cept it highlights the suspected words as [ and < symbols. There haven't been any malicious edits to the Badwords list, at least none that I can see... anyway, your help would be much appreciated. Cheers, Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 20:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Just to make the orange banner appears as the precedent notice was marked as minor edit ;-) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 21:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

My bad, I forgot about autochecked minor edits. Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 06:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Resolved

Seems to have been resolved, no idea how. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 18:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Inclusion of userscript as Gadget.

Hi Lupin,

What is the procedure for requesting that a userscript become a gadget. My script for bypassing Special:Book_sources is fairly popular (700+ users) and, in my opinion, very useful.

Lunchboxhero (talk) 18:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

There isn't one, and yours can't be used because you need to manually add a URL. Prodego ^talk 00:08, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps there is not a formal procedure, but somebody or some group of people certainly decides what scripts become gadgets. You are quite right that the externISBN script in its present form is not ready for inclusion, but if there was interest, it could be made acceptable.

Lunchboxhero (talk) 04:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Recommended update to your RC filter

Hi. I've started reverting vandalism using you RC filter and it's a great tool. One thing I noticed though is that the links to warn vandals don't automatically add the shared IP notice to the talk pages of IPs like when you warn users using Twinkle. Is their any way to update the filter so that it will do this? Thanks.--Urban Rose (talk) 05:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Another popups suggestion

Fixing WP:OVERLINKing would be easier if Popups supported blue link removal :-) - ∅ (∅), 03:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

vandal tool

I cnat seem to get it instaled can you help me i dont know what to do any more! Greenrico09 (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

default value of popupStructure

Hi Lupin,

thanks for the popups -- they're great!

In the table of options at Wikipedia:Tools/Navigation popups, the value "shortmenus" is in bold to indicate the default value of popupStructure, but text to the right says that "menus" is the default value.

Joriki (talk) 14:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Just a little 'U' typo...

Hello Lupin! I seem to have found a repeated mistake on some pages, while I was logged in to my account on Wikipedia. It looks to me like it's a typo in one of the Popups software's strings, and that's why I address this message to you (correct me, please, if I was wrong).

For example, when on  "my talk"  page:, if I hover onto the link: "Post a message to Slaughtre", the popup titled: "User talk:Slaughtre" appears. In that popup's horizontal menu (to the right of the popup's title), I hover onto an item called: "user", and when a "user submenu" appears, I then hover onto an: "edit counter" item in this submenu. If the mouse cursor is left unmoved over this "edit counter" submenu link, the yellow rectangular tooltip appears after a while...

The tooltip says:  "Count the countributions made by Slaughtre", which probably should be:  "Count the contributions made by Slaughtre".

Here are the step-by-step screen dumps of my browser displaying the above mentioned typo:

• 
  The popup titled: "User talk:Slaughtre" appeared.
• 
  Hovered a "user" link to open the submenu.
• 
  Hovered "edit counter" until the tooltip appeared.
• 
  Marked the misspelled word: "countributions"...

The above example describes the "edit counter" link's tooltip typo, on a "User talk" page only, but later I realized, that this behavior is true for all other user-related links in popups, site-wide, so the affected URIs are not limited to the list below:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Slaughtre
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Slaughtre
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Slaughtre

In addition to that minor typo report, I would also like to thank you for your Popups soft! Despite the fact, I am quite new to editing Wikipedia, I already found this tool not only very pretty, but extremely useful too. I also hope that fixing all the instances of this typo (if it is a typo - counting countributions sounds nice:), will just be a matter of changing one string somewhere.   Cheers!    --slaughtre (talk) 19:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

AVT filters not working

The two filter pages (Filter recent changes & Live spellcheck) are not returning any changes. The framework works fine, but each update returns zilch.

I've tested it over and over again on different browsers and even on a test account with no other scripts. Still no changes coming up. Could you possibly take a look? haz (talk) 20:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

The "show details" links are also not working, on all four AVT pages. The edit summary is shown underneath the entry, but the actual diff is not. Possible page-parser fault? haz (talk) 20:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

What kind of browser are you using? I know for a fact that at least Safari is not supported by AVT. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 20:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Tested in IE7 and FF2. No JS errors reported by either. haz (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Popups suggestions

As the script now stands (a fascinating tool BTW, great thanks!), when a popup is generated for a link to a section, a preview of the first paragraph of that section is shown; however, if a link leads to an anchor in a page that is not a section, the first paragraph of the article is previewed, not of the linked part. (Sections are preceded by <a name="smth" id="smth"></a> HTML construction, while in most lists entries are surround either with <span id="smth">...</span> or <div id="smth">...</div> tags.) This is also the case with redirects to sections and list entries. For example, compare popups for Art inspired by J. R. R. Tolkien and Alliterative verse by J. R. R. Tolkien (both are "redirects with possibilities", to a section and a span'ed paragraph respectively); Minor places in Middle-earth#A (section) and Minor places in Middle-earth#Aldburg (div'ed entry). Can this be tweaked? (Added 15:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC): looking closer, I see that the popup for the third link shows not the first paragraph, but the first that consists of a text without div tags, but I suppose this is intentional.)

And another proposal. I suppose it would be handy to preview the table of contents in popups for articles; this would cast the light not only on the topic itself, but also on what is encompassed by the page. This could come as a custom option, if say popupToCs = true. What do you think? Súrendil (talk) 15:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

And #3. When previewing the contents of a category, would it be possible that the popup reacts on the from=<name> option in the link so that the contents are shown beginning from <name> member? Súrendil (talk) 14:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)