User talk:LulzWhateven
- Hello,LulzWhateven, I just found that Big Brother 12 (UK) has a winner and visit other seasons too and I didn't find any similarity, though spin-off are there by the name of Celebrity Big Brother, but here situation is different, five regular contestants continue in spin-off series, that means Bigg Boss 8 has no winner, if article is expended on a new page then what about regular season, what should be concluded on that page? we should remove all the Halla Bol challengers names from the article's infobox and from the elimination history chart by putting a finalist color bar in infobox on each regular contestants that continue and should mention in article monologue that series has five winners instead of one, which will continue in spin-off. Faizan(Talk) January 3, 2015 22: 33 (UTC).
Reference Errors on 5 February
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Bigg Boss page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bigg Boss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Brother. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Bigg Boss 9
[edit]I did for what you asked me to do. Plus i revamped the article with the information known. check the article and lemme know Fushan007Talk 13:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Fushan007: Thank you. Much appreciated. --LulzWhateven (talk) 11:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bigg Boss 8, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Brother. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Bigg Boss 9
[edit]It is better not to upload any house§ pictures as no international frenchise does. We should only make the page with authentic and required info. season should include following sections
- production and house theme
- sindycation details
- house allotment (if any)
- house summary approiate and to the point written wholey editor in his/ her words.
- elimination chart
- voting history
- ratings
- reception
Or anyother section related to series latter upon broadcast. Avoid uploading pictures ans unimportant details. Nauriya (talk) October 11,2015 9:10 (UTC).
- NauriyaWikipedia is not a 'They did it, so we should do it too' website. I have been editing the Bigg Boss articles since 2009. I know the sections by heart. A new inculsion is always nice so I decided to add the house pictures to aid clarity. Thanks for response. --LulzWhateven (talk) 16:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- LulzWhateven well then you know better. If i add summary in future please consider it do not delete like last time. And about pictures you know brother that they have to be sourced or unless they are from flicker. Any other source will not be entertained. Even if i upload them they will not stay and may be editors called them unccessary. Nauriya Talk 21:58, October 11,2015 (UTC).
- Nauriya I retained most of the Navras part that you installed. I must have only removed your summaries if they had lacked grammatical structure or relevance. --LulzWhateven (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- LulzWhateven well then you know better. If i add summary in future please consider it do not delete like last time. And about pictures you know brother that they have to be sourced or unless they are from flicker. Any other source will not be entertained. Even if i upload them they will not stay and may be editors called them unccessary. Nauriya Talk 21:58, October 11,2015 (UTC).
Do not mess with copyvio templates
[edit] Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template and/or edit the blanked content, as you did with Bigg Boss 9. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at a temporary subpage linked from the article, as instructed on the template itself. If you continue to disrupt the copyright investigation process, you may be blocked from editing. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- I did not remove/mess with the template. I studied the report and removed the copyvio material. The template remained intact. --LulzWhateven (talk) 11:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- I find that hard to believe. Did you "study" the big, bold heading at the very top that reads, "Do not restore or edit the blanked content on this page until the issue is resolved by an administrator, copyright clerk or OTRS agent", or the instructions below it on how to rewrite the article? —Psychonaut (talk) 13:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- I guess you should now believe that I tend to skip out some details. I am human and I guess this is what I must work on. The same thing is with those passages I installed on the Bigg Boss article that you've been accusing me of. Should have read them before adding them. My bad. --LulzWhateven (talk) 14:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- I find that hard to believe. Did you "study" the big, bold heading at the very top that reads, "Do not restore or edit the blanked content on this page until the issue is resolved by an administrator, copyright clerk or OTRS agent", or the instructions below it on how to rewrite the article? —Psychonaut (talk) 13:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 16
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bigg Boss 9, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Facemask. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)