User talk:Lulugo

Speedy deletion of "John Tantillo"

adjusting language that may be considered objectionable.

A page you created, John Tantillo, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 21:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of John Tantillo

A tag has been placed on John Tantillo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 22:33, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to John Tantillo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Montgomery' 39 (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to John Tantillo constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ^{Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja} 22:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to John Tantillo. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ^{Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja} 22:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of John Tantillo

A tag has been placed on John Tantillo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 00:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Tantillo

Just saw you recent edit adding the links to YouTube. Couple of things: the links were malformed - they don't need the trailing /, so I have fixed them; I am also concerned that the list of external links is getting way too long and that the YouTube links are excessive in number. From WP:EL - Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. Also, too many YT links could be considered promotional. – ukexpat (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC) Thanks for fixing the links. I'm relatively new to this and will cut some of the links. Thanks for your feedback. Lulugo (talk) 17:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Tantillo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Tantillo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Tantillo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Whisperjanes (talk) 02:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]