User talk:Luisitoalonzo

Proposed deletion of Natalie Pickles

The article Natalie Pickles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 21:50, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Georgina Wilson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 00:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barbara Katsuki

The article Barbara Katsuki has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ApprenticeFan ^work 02:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Natalie Pickles

The article Natalie Pickles has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ApprenticeFan ^work 02:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natalie Pickles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natalie Pickles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Pickles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ApprenticeFan ^work 13:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Barbara Katsuki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Katsuki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Katsuki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ApprenticeFan ^work 13:21, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kiana Guyon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiana Guyon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiana Guyon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 01:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Barbara Katsuki, you may be blocked from editing. Safiel (talk) 01:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Natalie Pickles. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to MJ Lastimosa. Thank you.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:38, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Callmemirela. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Hayden Byerly because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 14:36, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have nominated the news about Trump and Miss Universe for ITN. Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated recreation of Monika Sta. Maria

Hello. Please stop recreating the article, unless you also add reliable sources that establish her notability. The article has been redirected because of her being notable only for having participated in a reality show, which is not enough to get a stand-alone article. Thomas.W ^talk 06:15, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nash Aguas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Liza Soberano and Binibining Pilipinas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. There's no mention of the surname "Hanley" in the source in the article, if you want to add it, you must provide a reliable source for it. Thomas.W ^talk 11:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Selena Gomez & the Scene, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W ^talk 11:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Zendaya. Deliberate falsification of info Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:04, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:31, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Filipino people of Hungarian descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Filipino people of Hungarian descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]