User talk:Lucy Walter

Welcome!

Hello, Lucy Walter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:10, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Roch Castle

I've had to revert your edits to Roch Castle. While your version was significantly more detailed, it cited no sources, so we have no way of verifying whether those extra details are true or not. Please refer to Help:Citing sources for information on how to provide valid citations for your changes. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:10, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Your addition to Bostrycapulus pritzkeri has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Natureium (talk) 23:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twr y Felin, Tyddewi (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lucy Walter/Twr y Felin, Tyddewi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Lucy Walter/Twr y Felin, Tyddewi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lucy Walter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 12:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Penrhiw Priory) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Penrhiw Priory.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please be careful of cutting and pasting material from other sources onto WP. Please read WP:COPYVIO.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy material you find elsewhere online

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Continuing on your present course will likely lead to a block. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Walter (talk) 14:19, 6 May 2019 (UTC)== May 2019 ==[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:33, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Walter (talk) 14:19, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucy Walter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it's impossible to see what the errror is. As you can see from the Penrhiw Prioy page, we are just trying to get Twr y Felin it's own page. Many of the sources are to existing Wiki pages or external sources. Instead of blocking can't you just advise sensibly which copy is not allowed? And blocking indefinetly is ridiculous when clearly we are just trying to list a building. How can we get unblocked? I can't understand the process

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 14:54, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note also that shared accounts are not permitted. In your response to the questions above, please clearly state that only a single person has access to this account. --Yamla (talk) 14:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucy Walter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

here are the response to your questions. What is copyright? Copyright is the protection of words/music/art that has been created by someone. It gives the originator sole rights to share the work they have produced. How is Wikipedia licenced? It is co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Thes licences allows the content to be used freely. Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? Because Wikipedia would need to require permission from each originator to publish the content. The purpose of Wikipedia is to have content available that is copyright free so that others can use it. Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? If the content is already in the public domain or if it is compatible with the licenses. How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? By writing original copy only.

Decline reason:

Your answer to the question, "Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?", is incorrect. That is, yes, that would be acceptable but there's a significant other circumstance where we can use copyrighted material that is not released to the public domain and is not released under a license acceptable to us. You are welcome to make another request to provide a correct answer to this. Yamla (talk) 00:49, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucy Walter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1 Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? - Third allowed us is 'Fair Use' which allows use of copyrighted materials without obtaining permission as long as the use can be considered fair.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lucy Walter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reason is, you asked to provide the third reason for, Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? - The answer is - 'Fair Use' which allows use of copyrighted materials without obtaining permission as long as the use can be considered fair. This is the answer to your question, therefore the reason for unblocking Lucy Walter (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I am accepting your unblock request, as your responses show you now have a good understanding of the Wikipedia copyright policy and have confirmed the account is not shared. Further violations will result in you being re-blocked. I will be monitoring your contributions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: I'm considering an unblock here. As the blocking admin, what are your thoughts? --Yamla (talk) 16:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamla. The editor has not yet answered your question about shared accounts. Once that point is cleared up, I would be in favour of an unblock.— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:19, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm only one person has access to this account. It is not shared.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucy Walter (talk • contribs) 13:10, May 20, 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twr y Felin, Tyddewi (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lopifalko were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads like an advert, which of-course it is for a corporate retreat. Does not describe what is noteworthy or significant about it. Poorly sourced (1 generic listing from the AA; a routine business announcement from thecaterer.com; AA Hotel of the Year from an AA source is better but is primary; walesonline.co.uk is better but unlikely to be a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Twr y Felin, Tyddewi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Twr y Felin, Tyddewi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lopifalko (talk) 11:14, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you advise why Penrhiw is being considered for deletion, it is a historic property in St Davids? Hi can you advise why it would be removed as it is a historic property?

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penrhiw Priory. The result was 'speedy keep'. --Yamla (talk) 20:30, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Penrhiw Priory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Penrhiw Priory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penrhiw Priory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lopifalko (talk) 12:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Twr y Felin, Tyddewi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Twr y Felin, Tyddewi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Twr y Felin, Tyddewi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Twr y Felin, Tyddewi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --SqueePs10 ^Talk_{My edits} 05:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Twr y Felin, Tyddewi

Hello, Lucy Walter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Twr y Felin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Twr y Felin, Tyddewi

Hello, Lucy Walter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Twr y Felin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:08, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]