User talk:Lucy Locket

That was rather telling, how you blanked the page rather than reply. Give me one reason not to block this account indefinitely. Please read WP:SOCK as well first. --Guinnog 00:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I have blocked this account indefinitely. Please sit out your block rather than creating further sock accounts. Thanks. --Guinnog 00:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lucy Locket (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This user blocked me indefinitely for apparently being someone else even though I have never created another account and continuously keeps reverting all my work. Apparently they have a history of stalking people accusing them of many things and reverting many people's work for no reason. Can other administrators keep close watch of this 'Rogue Administrator' and take action needed to stop their often malicious behavior and suggest this user is no longer fit to be an Administrator. This user shows no consideration for the responsibility of their position, frequently starting disputes and taking sides, demonstrating no mediation or attempt to resolve issues but simply wielding their administrative powers to ensure their POV prevails. Surely someone who bullys users with their powers for disagreeing with them and blatantly undoes many people's work for no reason other than getting back at them does not deserve to be an Administrator and only demonstrates their lack of respect for their position. The fact they have blocked me indefinitely for no reason other than disagreeing with them on an issue in an article only reinforces this. Of course the real loser in all this is Wikipedia for the great amount of damage rogue Administrators such as themselves are causing by deterring and forcing others not to contribute towards Wikipedia as a whole. I seriously urge other administrators to strip this user of their administratorship so they can no longer cause such damage. Lucy Locket 01:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Pull the other one. -- Yamla 01:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of File:Super powers.png

The file File:Super powers.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, no source or reference to verify the information shown

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. matt br 13:53, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]