User talk:Luciareis

Welcome!

Hello, Luciareis, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 22:26, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Hi Luciareis welcome to English Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. If any of the articles you create are translations of articles from Portuguese Wikipedia it is our policy that you must attribute same by placing, for instance, {{translated page|pt|Outro Olhar}} or {{translated page|pt|Danielle, Asperger}} on the talk page of the new article or at the very least say something like "created by translating page from Portuguese Wikipedia" in an edit summary when creating the article. I hope you have a great time here and happy editing. Josey Wales^Parley 12:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Selma Sueli Silva moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Selma Sueli Silva, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sophia Mendonça has been nominated for deletion

Category:Sophia Mendonça has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Query

Hi there. I've noticed that many of your edits concern Sophia Mendonça. Do you have any connection with Sophia Mendonça outside of Wikipedia? Best, Spicy (talk) 18:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Luciareis, you did not respond to this, and I see that you have not used a talk page before. You will have to start communicating since there are concerns with your contributions. Jay 💬 21:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon reviews

Hi my friend. I hope you are fine. WP:RSPAMAZON says: "Amazon is a reliable source for basic information about a work (such as release date, ISBN, etc.)", but adds: "User reviews on Amazon are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable, and should not be used at all." Hope this helps. Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Entre Fadas e Bruxos

Hi my friend, this page seems to be shaping up pretty well, but it would really help if you could addres the issue of notability. Do you know of any third-party reviews of the book, or any wider media coverage, that might help you to demonstrate notability. HERE you will find Wikipedia's guidance on what type of evidence will be necessary. Very best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isabela Boscov moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Isabela Boscov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ikeda: Um Século de Humanismo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ikeda: Um Século de Humanismo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Transtorno do Espectro Autista e Acessibilidade Amorosa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Transtorno do Espectro Autista e Acessibilidade Amorosa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amores (a)Típicos

The article Amores (a)Típicos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any in-depth coverage of this podcast from independent, reliable, secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mundo Autista

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 07:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sophia Silva de Mendonça

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sophia Silva de Mendonça, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Silva de Mendonça moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sophia Silva de Mendonça, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sophia Mendonça

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sophia Mendonça, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sophia Mendonça

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sophia Mendonça, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 15:22, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sophia Mendonça for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophia Mendonça is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Mendonça until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Minha vida de trás pra frente for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minha vida de trás pra frente is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minha vida de trás pra frente until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maurício Guilherme Silva Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maurício Guilherme Silva Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurício Guilherme Silva Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raquel Romano for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raquel Romano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raquel Romano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 01:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Isabela Boscov

Hello, Luciareis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isabela Boscov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]