User talk:LucianaFash
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
First communications
[edit]Well, as you can see from the existing Internet Relationships page, there is much to be explored within the field of Internet Relationships. For me personally, I would like to further research the psychological factors that contribute to maintaining a relationship online. What about yourself? Tlarco29 (talk) 11:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Luciana, I am also highly interested in the internet relationship field. I know Kate is also, I thought it might be an idea to let you know this as we could potentially all work together. Charlierose91 (talk) 12:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Charlotte, What aspect of internet relationship are you interested in? I' mainly interested in how people converse online through different mediums and also the psychology behind the way people communicate online. LucianaFash (talk) 15:10, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, after reading your user page i have discovered that you also have an interest in Internet relationship and would just like to notify you that I am interested in this topic too Kate Carter-Rigg (talk) 03:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Luciana! :) I did contact you last week but didn't get a response, I was just wondering what aspect of internet relationships you and Tom were thinking of looking at, as Kate and I are also interested in the area. Charlierose91 (talk) 09:34, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi guys. When creating our page, after typing it in Word, do we copy and paste our working progress into our own 'My Sandbox' :) LucianaFash (talk) 00:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Also, sorry Charlotte, I did respond to your message, it's just above Kate's here on my Talk page :) LucianaFash (talk) 00:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Saw your message on Kates page, Thats okay, we will fill you in :) Charlierose91 (talk) 11:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. Sorry I had completely forgotten. LucianaFash (talk) 11:32, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hey, Just been looking at the current Internet relationship page and it's covering the area that I am writing about. I'm just asking if you think I should be editing and merging that in with my work. As it is clashing with what I am writing at times with the technologies? LucianaFash (talk) 09:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
I am saying this as it crops into my area with talking about high speed internet and so forth. I won't be merging it a lot and I will keep it as the introduction. Just I don't want to be repeating what it is saying about high speed internet. LucianaFash (talk) 10:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay, try it and see how it goes in your sandbox and then if there is an issue we can address it later, if it comes to it, we can re-write the introduction :) Charlierose91 (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay, great. I don't want to change it much, as it's quite a nice introduction. Just it's stepping on my toes a little with talking a little about the technologies.:) LucianaFash (talk) 10:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Alrighty, well, we shall just see how it goes :) Charlierose91 (talk) 10:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Yeah I can see how this has happened and having checked the page we need to make it clearer who's covering which topics within "internet relationships" so that we don't all write brief entries or excerpts that cover similar things. Maybe we should sandbox what we have so far and begin to piece together an order for the article etc? Tlarco29 (talk) 11:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Yeah. Although I would like to write a little more first before sandboxing mine. I thought the order had been established with Technologies being first, then your section, and then Charlottes on anonymity and dating, and then lastly Kate's section on the affects it has. Or would people prefer a different order? Just that order seems most logical to me... LucianaFash (talk) 11:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Mine is sandboxed and also some of it is on the page Kate Carter-Rigg (talk) 11:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
What do we think to the article order? And cool Kate, i'll have a read later over yours :) I've just put the banner up, that it is an educational project on the page, as it hadn't been done yet. LucianaFash (talk) 11:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
I was told to put it on the talk page and thats were i placed it so i moved it Kate Carter-Rigg (talk) 11:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
An invitation to the Teahouse... Please join us!
[edit]Hello! LucianaFash,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
|
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by McDoobAU93 13:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Hi, I'm not sure I am posting in the right place :/ I already left a message on Kate's talk page because it was the first I saw but I noticed there is a group of you guys working on the Internet relationship article so I wanted to ask all of you. This is the message I left for Kate: Hi! I am currently working on a class project to write a wikipedia article on a communications topic. I chose to write on the ways the internet is used for different types of communication. I am new to wikipedia too but I saw your article and don't want to go in and completely edit or delete you work. I was wondering if it would be okay if I add sections like personal relationships such as online dating and one on how the internet is used in the business world? If I have my own article, there would be too many similarities to yours and since they are both regarding the same topic, I figured we could merge! Hope to hear back soon. Thank you! Eewalsh (talk) 21:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Eewalsh
Proper referencing
[edit]Hey Lu, here's how you begin inline referencing properly (view this page in 'edit' to view the code):
Hope that helps. Tom Catterall and --NickBushell (talk) 19:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much, that's been very helpful. LucianaFash (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
There is a question at the Teahouse you might have interest in...
Dear LucianaFash, I just asked a question at the Teahouse that you might have interest in! I hope you'll stop by and participate! Sarah (talk) 01:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC) |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I've sent you my slides, hopefully you'll get them :) Charlierose91 (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Got them. Thanks :) LucianaFash (talk) 00:16, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
[edit]Hi Luciana! I just wanted to drop by from the Teahouse and bring you a fresh wiki-brownie and say hi! How is your Wikipedia experience going? See you around! Sarah (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2012 (UTC) |
Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host
This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)