User talk:Lowerkace

This is Lowerkace's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 5B (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See guidelines on notability of unreleased films. This draft lacks a Reception section. Perhaps that is not yet feasible, since the film has only been viewed once and is scheduled to be viewed at Cannes. If Reception information is not yet available, please resubmit when it can be added to this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:5B and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:5B, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:48, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lowerkace! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:48, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 5B (film) has been accepted

5B (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TryKid (talk) 02:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Lowerkace (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Moneymike247". The reason given for Moneymike247's block is: " Wikipedia Checkuser.svg Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text on your user talk page: {{unblock|Didn't do anything wrong ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org with your username and appeal. : Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SidneyDizon".

Blocking administrator: ‪Mz7‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Thanks for letting us know. I've blocked this account indefinitely as a sockpuppet of SidneyDizon. Yamla (talk) 02:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lowerkace (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet of SidneyDizon. I run my own media company called lowerkace media as well as work in marketing for a company called Rogers & Cowan. I created this account to create and update our film clients' wikipedia pages. SidneyDizon is a publicist at Rogers & Cowan although I do not nor have I ever worked directly with her or Moneymike247. We probably have the same IP address because we most likely all use our company's internet. I have to make edits to Rogers & Cowan's wikipedia page so need my account unblocked. Thank you. Lowerkace (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No thanks. That's not what Wikipedia is for. MER-C 19:59, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet debate notwithstanding, you will not be allowed to edit with this account name. Wikipedia has a hard rule that accounts cannot represent businesses. You would have to rename this account. As well, we discourage users from editing on behalf of their clients due to the inherent conflict of interest this poses. It's not prohibited outright, but you would have to abide by the conflict of interest rules and also the strict, non-negotiable paid editing disclosure policy. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]