User talk:LoveFerguson

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. May I ask if you have edited Wikipedia before, and if so, under what user name? Cheers, Huldra (talk) 22:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have read articles in Wikipedia for a long time, but I started to edit recently. Thanks for asking.--LoveFerguson (talk) 00:15, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, I wish you would spend more time cycling; much more of a rewarding hobby, isn´t it? Huldra (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What?--LoveFerguson (talk) 04:26, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi NoCal. nableezy - 18:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza Strip

The source you restored, "Why does Israel supply Gaza with electricity and cement?", is an opinion piece, not a news article. Per WP:NEWSORG, a section of Wikipedia's guideline concerning reliable sources, opinion pieces are not considered reliable sources for statements of fact.

The source you added, "Guide: Gaza under blockade", does not support the information in the sentence you restored. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:09, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBPIA alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious reference

"http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/default-search-page-layout" is not a journal reference but just a search page, and searching for "Hillel Neuer" there gets no hits. How can you explain your edit summary? In fact this "reference" was simply lifted from the UN Watch web page. Zero^talk 10:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the source--LoveFerguson (talk) 10:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even look at that before you copy-pasted the URL? Where can I find the New York Law Journal mentioned on that page? By the way, that's not a reliable source anyway. It's a bio for a conference talk either supplied by the speaker or abstracted from the UN Watch page. Zero^talk 10:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Gaza_Strip#Edit_warring_over_the_lead --Avner Kushner (talk) 00:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1RR violation at Hillel Neuer

You just violated 1RR at Hillel Neuer, since the topic is clearly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. I'll give you a short time to self-revert in order to prevent a report. Zero^talk 11:52, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I didn't know Neuer was part of ARBPIA.--LoveFerguson (talk) 11:54, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of NoCal100 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

It is apparent this is a NoCal100 sockpuppet. Blocked. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 07:48, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]