User talk:Louisa Leontiades

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meg John Barker has been accepted

Meg John Barker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Oo7565 (talk) 19:10, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meg John Barker (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meg John Barker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Meg John Barker concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Meg John Barker, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Louisa Leontiades (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not a web host provider. Please clarify to me how I can prove I am not a web host provider. I would like to improve the article but it has taken me time to evaluate how!

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for being a web host provider, your IP range is blocked because it belongs to a webhost provider that has been used contrary to Wikipedia policies. You will not be able to edit while using this web hosting service. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:34, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Louisa Leontiades (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi there, I have investigated into what seems to be the problem. A contact of mine said: 'it would be most likely the host of the email you used. You can verify that either by emailing back (probably best) & asking them if that's what you mean, or it could be that it's a problem they have with your Swedish ISP company, which connects your computer with the Internet. Best to sort out by asking them which of the two it is. Then you know what to work on.' Just in case it is the former, I have change my log in email address to a gmail one. If it is the Swedish ISP company then I won't be able to change it i don't think, Thanks, Louisa

Decline reason:

It has nothing to do with what email you signed up with, but rather what IP you are editing from, which would be a function of your ISP. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meg John Barker has been accepted

Meg John Barker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)