User talk:Lottery111

My name is Lottery and im amazing!

May 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 23:48, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Electriccatfish2. Jim1138 (talk) 23:53, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 23:55, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are stupidhead

Y U BE STUPIDHEAD???!!!???? derpderpderpherpaderp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninjatsudude (talk • contribs) 01:07, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 13:36, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 16:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lottery111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been playing Diablo II for years. The information that I placed on the page was 100% accurate and correct. The blocking by these edits is not right. The first one where I expanded on the characters may have been seen as vandalism, but the information on act 3 and 4 was 100% correct. I do not understand why I was blocked for this. I am also not the same person as Ninjatsudude. That is my friend. Lottery111 (talk) 01:53, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Lottery111[reply]

Decline reason:

The fact that you made one non-vandal edit does not change the fact that every other edit you made was vandalism, which, regardless of who the other editor is, is what you were blocked for. Please address that issue if you wish to be unblocked. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.