User talk:LosPajaros

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello LosPajaros! Your additions to Tiffany P. Cunningham have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 02:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, LosPajaros. Thank you for creating Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Audio recordings

May I ask how you extracted some of your audio recordings for the Senate? The Upload Wizard is easy enough but the extraction of audio files from C-SPAN videos is what I'm concerned about. I may add recordings for senators who just left office. SuperWIKI (talk) 07:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I use a program called '4k video downloader' on specific videos to download them. I then cut the videos to the specific quote or length that I want using the website 'clipchamp.com'. this converts it into a .mp4 format for audio. I then use a different program called 'online-convert.com' to convert it into the .ogg file that is applicable for Wikimedia commons uploading. LosPajaros (talk) 20:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! SuperWIKI (talk) 22:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Souter

Hi. Your filename for the recording is "David Souter on the Missouri Plan and the the election of judicial offices.ogg" and so there is a repeated "the" ("the the"). You should probably rename it, and any references to it… thanks. jhawkinson (talk) 01:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Fetterman

Just wanted to make a comment. Senator Fetterman has returned to the Senate full-time but due to his stroke last year which also sparked an auditory processing disorder, most YouTube public domain clips of him at hearings have his voice slurred and/or stuttering. How do we find a specimen voice clip of him as a Senator now? We can either wait for his health to improve or for a voice clip of him as Lt. Gov. Of Pennsylvania or Mayor of Braddock.

As for me, I'm gathering voice clips for senators as far back as the January 3, 2009 term (111th United States Congress). Currently at the 2014 United States Senate elections. SuperWIKI (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was putting Fetterman on hold until after he came back to see if his speaking faculties were back up at 100% or not. Given it seems like it'll take a bit of time for those to be at full steam I've gotten a past audio clip of him speaking before the House as a witness that should work until we have an audio file for him where his speaking abilities are back to his prior levels. LosPajaros (talk) 23:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

C-SPAN

I did a little poking around, and wanted to clarify something to you. The only C-SPAN materials that are explicitly in the public domain are footage of the House and Senate floor sessions, where the cameras are government-owned.

Anything else on C-SPAN, including committee hearings, press conferences and non-floor speeches are not in the public domain, and any audio files you've uploaded to such effect may be deleted in the future for copyright reasons.

However, congressional committees these days have their own in-house streams on their official website and/or YouTube channel, some of which stretch as far back as the early 2000s. For your audio files extracted from committee hearings, you may want to go back through them and switch the URL and author, since the audio on the government livestream and the C-SPAN broadcasts are basically the same. Quite a lot of senators and representatives have YouTube channels run by their respective offices, so you can find replacement links from there as well.

I'm about to go to bed, but from my brief look into your uploads, Tuberville's and Kelly's files are potential liabilties. I've already gone through my own uploads (stopped at the 2012 Senate elections). SuperWIKI (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For further floor sessions uploaded from C-SPAN, I just found this PD template today. SuperWIKI (talk) 15:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LosPajaros: Angus King's file (the re-upload) is a blatant screengrab of a C-SPAN programme that isn't a floor speech. So it doesn't qualify under C-SPAN public domain or government public domain. It can be assumed that King's office got special permission from C-SPAN or uploaded it via shoddy staff work, either way that file shouldn't be used. Sorry for the inconvenience. SuperWIKI (talk) 02:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for writing Arizona v. Navajo Nation! Larataguera (talk) 09:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon H. Smith

Just saw that you were editing Gordon H. Smith. I have a file of him talking about voting rights already, I just need to clean and cut it for tomorrow. Thanks. SuperWIKI (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My current slate for the week

Note: This only covers sitting representatives and recently-retired (from the 2019 election) ones. I don't expect that any of my other uploads of earlier politicians will conflict with yours. Also adding several Trump cabinet members.

~~Jackie Speier, successor to Tom Lantos (D-CA)~~
~~John Sarbanes, son of Sen. Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)~~
~~Donald Payne Jr., son of Congressman Donald M. Payne (D-NJ)~~
~~Warren Davidson, successor to former Speaker John Boehner (R-OH)~~
~~Jim Mattis, 26th secretary of defense, retired USMC general~~
~~Mark Esper, 27th secretary of defense, 23rd secretary of the Army~~
~~Gina Haspel, 7th CIA director~~
~~John Ratcliffe, 6th Director of National Intelligence, former representative from Texas~~

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Breyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Roberts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:35, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Henry Friendly

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Henry Friendly you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 02:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Henry Friendly

The article Henry Friendly you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Henry Friendly for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 13:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lyndon B. Johnson. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]