User talk:LosAngeles007
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, LosAngeles007, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kate marie davies, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! APK whisper in my ear 11:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kate marie davies
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kate marie davies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. APK whisper in my ear 11:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kate davies has been reverted.
Your edit here to Kate davies was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.twitter.com/realkatedavies) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Kate davies have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.
Your edit here to Kate davies was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.twitter.com/realkatedavies) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
[edit] Hello, LosAngeles007. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
- instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Why you page keeps getting deleted
[edit]In answer to the question you posed about not understanding why the page keeps ending up as sniper fodder, I'm going to walk you through what already happened, what is happening, and what will likely happen (in that order) so as to clarify this.
Some time back the article we had for Kate Marie Davies was nominated for deletion. As you can read here, this meant that the community was asked to weigh in on weather or not the actress's article as it currently stood demonstrated enough notability under the existing general notability guidelines to remain on Wikipedia. The consensus at the time was that the article did not have sufficient notability because the actress hasn't won a noble prize, or star in over 100 films in less than 90 days, or gotten an Oscar, or an Emmy, or so on in the matter. Consequently, the article was deleted without prejudice to recreation if and when the actress reached a point where notability could be reasonably demonstrated.
Because the article was deleted through the articles for deletion process here, a special condition automatically attached to the article that stipulates that when the article reaches a point where it can come back it must not reappear on this site in the form it originally had when it was deleted. This is where you keep running into trouble: in each case your attempted rebuild of the article has mirrored the deleted version enough that this clause has come into play. It presents itself under the criteria known as G4, which is reserved for material deleted through the articles for deletion process that comes back at 8-% or better what it was when it was deleted in the first place. Consequently, this has repeatedly lined your article up for deletion almost before its gotten off the ground.
Now if nothing changes on this "recreate, delete, recreate, delete" cycle there are two ways that this will end in the near future, neither one of which is going to be happy. In the first instance, the article title(s) that you are attempting to get the actress recreated at will end up protected, meaning that no one save for the admin corp will be able to edit the pages. The other option is that this account will end up blocked permanently on grounds that its sole purpose is for advertisement or promotion of a person, product, or service on Wikipedia, which is against our existing policies. For what it is forth, there may come a day when Kate becomes famous enough to get back on here, but for right nw its simply too soon for us to entertain an article for her on Wikipedia. TomStar81 (Talk) 20:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 22)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LosAngeles007/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! LosAngeles007,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 26)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LosAngeles007/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher Mark Pattinson (December 26)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher Mark Pattinson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.