User talk:Lordgodable

Welcome!

Hello, Lordgodable, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Dionny baez, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! XXX antiuser ^eh? 21:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dionny baez

The article Dionny baez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has claims to notability, thus not qualifying for CSD:A7, but subject doesn't seem to pass WP:NOTE. Sounds like a resume and the only refs are the subject's own websites.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. XXX antiuser ^eh? 21:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Dionny baez

I have nominated Dionny baez, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dionny baez. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. XXX antiuser ^eh? 23:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dionny baez. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. XXX antiuser ^eh? 22:35, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Dionny baez, you will be blocked from editing. XXX antiuser ^eh? 03:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Dionny baez, you will be blocked from editing. XXX antiuser ^eh? 23:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sourced information from Dionny baez

Please stop. Your continued removal of well-sourced information from that article violates WP:NPOV. If you do it again you will be blocked. XXX antiuser ^eh? 23:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]