User talk:Lord Law Law
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Lord Law Law! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 02:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Hale
[edit]Substantive male life peers are styled "The Right Honourable The Lord XXXX", and substantive female life peers as "The Right Honourable The Baroness XXXX". "The Right Honourable The Lady XXXX" is generally only used for wives of barons (or maybe Scottish Ladies of Parliament). This does not apply to later female Supreme Court justices (such as Jill Black) for are not ennobled as Hale was, only given courtesy titles.
As for the photograph, I thought it would be better to use one that was upright rather than at a Dutch angle. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 19:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for that clarification. I see the logic. In legal circles, she is generally known as Lady Hale; see OSCOLA, 2.1.7.[1]. If there is a practice of referring to female peers by their specific title, to indicate they have the title themselves rather than via their spouse, then I see that will take precedence. Lord Law Law (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
DS Alerts
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
October 2020
[edit]
Hello, I'm Pigsonthewing. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Sandister Tei. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.
In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]You have been mentioned here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/RaymondCHedges Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:01, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Snooganssnoogans: Thanks. I have replied. Happy editing. Lord Law Law (talk) 03:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |