User talk:LordGorval
1 Corinthians 15:3–4
[edit]What is your point in changing this:
To this?
- 1 Corinthians 15:3–4[1]
It only serves to make the link harder to access and the page longer. Please stop. Carlaude:Talk 04:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Old Latin verses New Latin
[edit]Is "Old Latin" and "New Latin" that much different? Is there other versions of Latin? What was the Latin last used? Approximately when were these various versions of Latin in use?--LordGorval (talk) 11:43, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- You can click on the links in the table below to read about the various periods into which Latin usage has been divided. You may want to start with History of Latin. Deor (talk) 12:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
January 2012
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Holy Spirit (Christianity). Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 23:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
nonsense on Pmanderson's talk page
[edit]when he said user was blocked for a year he wasn't referring to you, but to PMA, the user whose talk page you were on. you are not blocked. Can you stop with the noise now? Dicklyon (talk) 22:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- well, you can keep removing my comments about PMA's disruptive editing, however the secret is already out. Many people already know his bad history of edit warring and disruptive editing. By not allowing me to edit about this still does NOT change his bad history. They already know. I'll just wait it out and eventually after y'all get tired of him perhaps you will ban him permanently. My comments as a minnow means nothing. He can do himself in faster than anything I can ever say. I'll go on to improving the encyclopedia and you guys can play with PMA. Have fun.--LordGorval (talk) 23:11, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:LordGorval/Exodus 1
[edit]User:LordGorval/Exodus 1, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LordGorval/Exodus 1 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:LordGorval/Exodus 1 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:LordGorval
[edit]User:LordGorval, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LordGorval and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:LordGorval during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:50, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, LordGorval. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ANI discussion of you editing at Willis Fletcher Johnson
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 08:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- See https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=1133780550 SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
January 2023
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.