User talk:Lomrjyo/Archives/2022/January

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lomrjyo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2022)

A man playing the didgeridoo, an indigenous instrument of Australia that was developed at least 1,500 years ago. This is one of the myriad topics within the history of music.

Hello, Lomrjyo. The article for improvement of the week is:

History of music

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Carapace • Goat meat

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2022)

Hello, Lomrjyo. The article for improvement of the week is: Reader Rabbit Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: History of music • Carapace Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Peng Shuai on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2022)

A NeXTstation graphics workstation from 1990

Hello, Lomrjyo. The article for improvement of the week is:

Workstation

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Reader Rabbit • History of music

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

RfA

Hey, Lomrjyo! I wanted to point you at Wikipedia:Should you ask a question at RfA? as it may be of interest. valereee (talk) 19:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Read. Is there any specific concern that you had with my question? Or did you want me to read that for future reference. -- lomrjyo ^{(✉ • 📝)} 19:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey, Lomrjyo. Yes, 'What are your plans after adminship?' is quite an odd question, frankly. What possible answer could make you decide not to support a candidacy? Like, you expected them to say, "Oh, this is just hat-collecting! I wanted to be able to brag I was an admin on Wikipedia!" Or what? RfA is an incredibly stressful period for most candidates. Many spend the entire week refreshing the page and wake up each morning filled with dread for what might have transpired while they were asleep. Extra questions are just not helpful, so we try to encourage people to ask only those questions that actually would help !voters make a decision. I just don't see what possible usefulness "what are your plans after adminship?" could be for helping you or other !voters make a decision whether to support or oppose. I know that when you see that anyone can ask up to two questions, it's very tempting to try to come up with a question to ask. valereee (talk) 19:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

@Valereee I'm sorry. Please strike my question. I also had a different question originally, but refactored it last minute. Lomrjyo (public) (talk) 19:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Lomrjyo, the question has already been answered, so we can't strike it. But your question all by itself is not a big deal. It's the cumulative effect, and my only concern is to maybe help people think before asking a question next time. :) Best to you. valereee (talk) 20:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

That makes sense. Thanks for letting me know. Lomrjyo (talk • contribs) 20:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)