User talk:Loke Laufeyiarson

Thought Police in real life

Leftists use thought police to control people's thoughts. At employers they put stress on people while they work and overwork them and feed them leftist ideas to brainwash them while their mind is open to suggestions. The thought police exist in Hollywood to make movies with anti-USA subliminal messages and they use actors and actresses to give those messages to the public like Rosie O'Donnell attacking Christianity because the thought police are against that religion. If thought police follow a religion it is most likely atheism or worshipping moloch and pretending to be of another religion, or an atheist, secularist, humanist, communist, etc. The whole idea of political correctness was to control people's thoughts, but notice that groups the thought police want to attack are not protected like christians. If political correctness was fair and just, christians would be protected as would everyone else. More proof of the favoritism and bias that the thought police use for the left against all others opposed to them. Another method is via news programs, blogs, etc. Brainwashing is quite effective when key words used to trigger emotions and thus stress are used on the unsuspecting public. Notice how the liberal blogs use emotions to manipulate and control people into believing them. The thought police use a variety of fallacies this way in blogs and the media and news for propagana, manipulation, and lies. Recently Hugo Chavez used this technique by calling the USA President the Devil, and used emotions to manipulate people and used many fallacies like personal attacks, strawmen, appeal to emotions, appeal to common belief, appeal to false authority. Chavez was using thought police tactics on the rest of the world to manipulate them into his way of thinking. Oddly he said that Bush should have a psychologist examine his words, but any psychologist can tell you that calling another person the devil is a sign of mental illness, plus other words that Chavez used. Loke Laufeyiarson 00:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fascist Thought Police against Loke

Thank you for experimenting with the page Hugo Chávez on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Sandy 00:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So the thought police run Wikipedia now, eh? Loke Laufeyiarson 00:55, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Genocide and totalitarian administration

Dear Laufeyiarson, please do not be too quick to pick splinters from the eye of other people. Before claiming to have creditability for charges of genocide against Mr Chávez, you might first want to gain creditability by documenting Mr Bush's profiteering from the genocide of West Papua, Bechtel's long term funding of his family's political careers, and his support of the TNI funding and training of various Islamic terrorist networks including Laskar Jihad, JI, the BMP, as well trans-national groups like Al-Qaeda, and the Indonesian FPI political group that so kindly told the people of Aceh that the tsunami was God's punishment for their rejection of Jakarta's offer to allow Sharia Law instead of independence.

Like the US Congress majority I am opposed to Bechtel and Bush support of these Islamic terrorists and their colonization of West Papua, and would prefer the US Dept. of State to be allowed to promote democracy and freedom even for black people in Papua rather than the Indonesian colonial licensing of Papua's vast gold & copper reserves to Bechtel's mine operated by the Freeport McMoran corporation.

Did you think the majority of Republican Congressmen enjoyed watching their party be hi-jacked by the neo-republican / neo-colonial movement? When you have a better understanding of what is going on in the world and who has been funding & empowering the Islamic terrorist networks, only then should you consider telling your community about world affairs. Ref: http://fandom.net 211.30.222.139 04:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More from the thought police and this time using fallacies, strawmen, appeal to emotions, appeal to false athority, using unrealiable sources, and personal attacks. Your logic is flawed, and therefore your argument is invalid and false. Loke Laufeyiarson 14:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo Chávez

Really, you need to stop with this persecution complex "though police" stuff. No one is out to get you on this. I'd love to see information from his latest speech in the article, but you must understand that the article is watched by many pro-Chavez editors and anything with less than perfect sourcing will be removed if it could be read as anti-Chavez. That's the way contentious articles are sometimes, I'm sorry to say.

Again, I have nothing against the addition, I'm just saying it must be done carefully. When I tried to revise some glaring mistakes in the economics of the article, I found my edit reverted almost immediately. I had to work through thr Talk page to get any information in at all. (It was eventually successful, though I wasn't the one to add it myself.) Working with others can be hard, bu it's the way to get things done. CRGreathouse (t | c) 16:58, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, Pro-Chavez is not a NPOV. It goes against Wikipedia policy. All I posted were the truth about what Chavez said. Here is one of his speeches you can watch it for yourself. See how undiplomatic and unchristian he is. I posted it in a NPOV but a Pro-Chavez administrator deleted it. I said that Chavez called Bush the devil here is proof and they deleted it! I cited it and they did not care because they are the thought police. They claimed I made all of this up, but all I did was post the words that Chavez used in his speeches at the UN and to the press. You don't know my history, people are really out to get me because I am posting the truth on the Internet. It is a big leftist conspiracy and the roots of it go deep in the USA and other nations by tratiors to the USA, Canada, UK, EU, etc. The thought police are leftist in nature and censor people like me, even if I cite sources and show the words that people speak. Then they go and write lies, fabircations, manipulations, in blogs, newspapers, wiki sites, forums, news programs, etc. Chavez is the Hitler of South America, and while he claims to be a christian he is more like an antichrist in his words and actions. Did you know that 85% of his people live in poverty and that he owns Citgo and does not share his wealth with his people? He'd rather give discounted or free heating oil to the USA's poor to bring up support so they can help him overthrow the USA government. Cindy Sheehan is but a puppet of Chavez and other leftists. Would these Pro-Chavez people really want to live in a nation like Venezuela with an 85% poverty rate whose main economic resource is oil, that Chavez controls but does not share the wealth with his people? Face facts, I was censored by Pro-Chavez thought police and they are trying to cover it up. All they have done is prove my prosecution 100% by their censorship of me and the way they posted an anonymous thought police reaction in my talk page from some anonymous IP puppet of theirs. Loke Laufeyiarson 19:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]