User talk:Logixoul
SoundSpel
[edit]I noetist on yur taak paej that U liek SoundSpel. I hav a uezerbox staeting that we suport speling reform. If U wont, just copy it. I too liek SoundSpel a lot and hav aded sum informaeshun too the articl. Cameron Nedland 21:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not an apropriat plaes for displaeing informaeshon about mieself, soe I dont uez uezerboxes. --logixoul 22:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Okae, thot U miet liek it. Doo U liek the adishuns too SoundSpel?Cameron Nedland 04:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Asied from the fact thae wer copyriet vieolaeshons, and that thae wernt wikified (wow, wikified aent chaenj speling), I waz dilieted. Now I ges its mie tern to ask: doo U liek the rivamp too SoundSpel? --logixoul 09:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Verry nies, exept wun theeng: Wie did U deleet sum of the texts?Cameron Nedland 20:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Bicoz they:
- oeverwhelmd the reedr with ixesivly much matiriel
- didnt ad value too the artikel
- seemd az if choesn at random
- Feel free too argue about that, of caurs. --logixoul 21:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enuf, I just thot that the mor the merryer, thae wer all frum the SSS websiet. I particuelarrily liekt the wun about anchent Eejipt.Cameron Nedland 17:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Bicoz they:
- Verry nies, exept wun theeng: Wie did U deleet sum of the texts?Cameron Nedland 20:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Asied from the fact thae wer copyriet vieolaeshons, and that thae wernt wikified (wow, wikified aent chaenj speling), I waz dilieted. Now I ges its mie tern to ask: doo U liek the rivamp too SoundSpel? --logixoul 09:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Okae, thot U miet liek it. Doo U liek the adishuns too SoundSpel?Cameron Nedland 04:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Elwiki answered your email?
[edit][1] What email address did you use? I have tried and tried to contact them and never have they answered. Anomo 15:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- logixoul@gmail.com --logixoul 15:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Esperanto
[edit]Ar u lerning Esperanto?Cameron Nedland 02:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
- I (kienda) lernd it an yeer agoe. Then Justin B Rye convinst mee (after a huej eemail discushon wich I dont keep - maibi hee duz) that Esperanto has absoluetly noe chans ov acheeving significant uez as an Internashonal auxiliary langwij. This eliminaitid mie interest in it. Weer oftopic btw. --logixoul 19:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry bro. I kienda liek Esperanto.Cameron Nedland 20:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- From a lingwistic point ov vue I liek Vorlin and Lojban beter FWIW. I allsoe fiend all Jermanic and Slavic langwijis, French, and Italian mor pleezing too lisen too/look at. :) --logixoul 21:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- I liek Vorlin az wel, but I fiend Loezhbaan a litel too straenj for me. I liek the iedeas ov Sloevio and Folkspraak (I doent no how it iz pronounst).:)Cameron Nedland 00:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- From a lingwistic point ov vue I liek Vorlin and Lojban beter FWIW. I allsoe fiend all Jermanic and Slavic langwijis, French, and Italian mor pleezing too lisen too/look at. :) --logixoul 21:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry bro. I kienda liek Esperanto.Cameron Nedland 20:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Slab serif article
[edit]Thanks for the comment! :-)) CApitol3 20:52, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Ht-//dig
[edit]A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Ht-//dig, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 19:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
December 2007
[edit] With regard to your comments on Talk:The Matrix: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Alientraveller (talk) 15:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
KCall
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/dc/Nuvola_apps_important_yellow.svg/48px-Nuvola_apps_important_yellow.svg.png)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article KCall, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}}
to the top of KCall. BJTalk 13:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Comment
[edit]Can you see Template talk:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-3.0? — Omegatron 01:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)