User talk:Logical Puzzle
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Logical Puzzle! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing!
Additionally, I would say that Draft:Falguni Nayar isn't a good candidate for speedy deletion right now, under any criteria. Best, Mackensen (talk) 11:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Mackensen, It's not written in a formal way, it's written like a newspaper. How can I delete the draft? Logical Puzzle (talk) 11:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Logical Puzzle, it was already declined as a submission for that and other reasons, so it'll be deleted in six months if nothing is done to correct those issues. Alternatively, there's still an opportunity to rewrite it to remove those problems. Mackensen (talk) 12:03, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
[edit]
Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Falguni Nayar, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi CommanderWaterford, the article is not written in a formal way, it's just like a news paper reports. Logical Puzzle (talk) 12:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is a legitimate draft (declined once) that has potential to succeed as an article. You are temp blocked from editing this draft because all of your edits to date have been attacks on this draft. I suggest that when the temp block ends, you refrain from editing the draft. If the draft does succeed, you can start an AfD if you still believe the article content is not Wikipedia quality. David notMD (talk) 15:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Logical Puzzle, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Yogeshwarah (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello bonadea, the other account,Yogeshwarah is my brother's account. Did I wanna delete this account? I was not aware of this. We both love to edit on Wikipedia. That's why we created one. Sorry if I did any mistake. Logical Puzzle (talk) 08:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
What's the deal here?
[edit]You have tagged Draft:Deepinder Goyal in an attempt to have that draft speedily deleted (it is not eligible for speedy deletion), and at the same time you have uploaded an image of Goyal to Wikimedia Commons, claiming that the picture is your own work. You also claim that File:Priya Prakash Varrier.jpg is your own work; that image was added to Priya Prakash Varrier by Yogeshwarah, the creator of Draft:Deepinder Goyal. What is going on? --bonadea contributions talk 21:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix man, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.