User talk:Loessperson

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Hardcastle has been accepted

John Hardcastle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Loessperson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vsmith (talk) 12:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loess Letter (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Loess Letter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades ^Godric 13:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Loessperson, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winged Blades Godric 13:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Please fix footnotes at Draft:Loess Letter

I have fixed the first one for you as an example of how to code footnotes; you can also see WP:REFB for more guidance on creating automated footnotes. Please fix these in your draft for smoother review. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Loessperson. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mz7 (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loess Letter (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Loess Letter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Marton Pecsi

Marton Pecsi (1923-2003) was a Hungarian geographer and loess scholar; he was a member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and Director of the Geographical Institute. He graduated from the Eotvos Lorand University in 1949. His doctoral dissertation dealt with palaeogeography and geomorphology of the Pannonian Plain and Carpathian Mountains, and with the history of fluvial terrace formation in the middle reaches of the Danube. Widescale Quaternary studies carried out under his guidance resulted in publications such as the National Atlas of Hungary, a seven volume monograph on Hungarian landscapes and many others. Marton Pecsi fully appreciated the loess series significance as a source of data on the history of environments. He was President of the INQUA Loess Commission from 1977 to 1991. This was a critical time for the Loess Commission and Pecsi oversaw the expanding of its sphere of influence from Central Europe to Worldwide, and the beginnings of studies on practical problems. He was President when Loess Letter was launched, this became one of the most successful INQUA newsletters. A memorial Issue of Quaternary International was produced in 2006, entitled 'Loess and Palaeoenvironments across Eurasia.

Draft:Loess Letter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Loess Letter, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Loess Letter

Hello, Loessperson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Loess Letter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Parna (geology)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Parna (geology), Loessperson!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I moved the title to a more standard disambiguation.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 22:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

London Stock bricks

London Stock bricks were the default building bricks in nineteenth century London. This was a time when London was expanding rapidly and many bricks were required. The London Stock was so named because it was made (by hand on a frame or stock); the main source material was the brickearth (loess) which was found in the London region and in north Kent and south Essex. They were fired with admixtures of chalk and combustible rubbish (often called spanish); the chalk gave the fired brick a yellow colour and the spanish improved firing efficiency. The below ground monument to the London Stock brick is the Bazalgette sewer system (1860-1880) which saved London from cholera; the above ground monument is probably Kings Cross station built of yellow Stock bricks in 1852. Loessperson (talk) 12:00, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Loessification moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Loessification, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julius Fink (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Julius Fink and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julius Fink (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Julius Fink and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Loessification

Hello, Loessperson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Loessification, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Julius Fink

Hello, Loessperson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Julius Fink, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Julius Fink

Hello, Loessperson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julius Fink".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)