User talk:Lobeyd
Welcome
[edit]
|
Lobeyd, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Lobeyd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC) |
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Lobeyd! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Ways to improve Rahul Mehta
[edit]Hello, Lobeyd,
Thanks for creating Rahul Mehta! I edit here too, under the username FULBERT and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Please include additional references to establish notability beyond only those that establish the person exists.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
FULBERT (talk) 18:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Rachel Owens) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Rachel Owens.
User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
The coverage for this subject is on the borderline for establishing notability: the only cited source that has the kind of independent, reliable coverage we need is the article in Hyperallergic. Other sources are either insufficiently independent (all of the citations to art museums displaying Owen's work, and a few more that look like press releases) or contain insufficient coverage of Owens (such as the New York Times and the Time Out New York pieces). Please provide more citations to reliable sources in order to firmly establish that the subject meets the general notability guideline. You may also want to look at the subject-specific notability guideline for artists, WP:NARTIST.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 23:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Amy Myers (artist)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Amy Myers (artist).
User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article on the artist Amy Myers.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Clarity Haynes
[edit]Hello, Lobeyd,
Thanks for creating Clarity Haynes! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Thank you for your new article on Clarity Haynes, though I recommend cleaning it up a bit to comply with Wikipedia's style guidelines. For pointers, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)