User talk:Lobeveeps

Lobeveeps, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lobeveeps! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring and POV-pushing

You appear to be engaging in anti-religion POV-pushing edit wars at Performance art and Enemy, adding images to the pages that do not fit well with the topics of those pages, and with overtones that appear to be intended to mock the religious beliefs associated with those images. Please desist from this behavior. Where an image that you have added to a page has been removed, do not revert the removal of that image. Rather, initiate a discussion on the talk page to generate a consensus in favor of inclusion of that image. Pinging @Power~enwiki: for any additional thoughts, as you have also reverted his removal of an image. bd2412 T 01:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image additions are largely problematic and unexplained; I don't have anything else to add to bd2412's comments. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No anti-religion here buddy. For performance art, I added a "citation needed" which is his edit summary by the way.Lobeveeps (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, guess I'll discuss.Lobeveeps (talk) 02:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)::[reply]

Also, some of the images you reverted are clearly relevant to their articles; for example, you reverted away the religious image I added even though the title of the article is "Prophet"Lobeveeps (talk) 02:39, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, Power did not revert my removing of an image, he reverted my adding of an image.Lobeveeps (talk) 02:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prophet already contains numerous religious images. There is no need to add another, and in many of these cases there is no need to add more images to pages that already have them. You are also removing images already on the page to add your images, without any discussion of whether those images should be removed. bd2412 T 03:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Performance art. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason='}}. bd2412 T 03:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lobeveeps (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I actually made a compromise according to his standards, what is this block?Lobeveeps (talk) 03:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) I'm fine with the image on Performance art as it stands (it's a bit odd, but justified well enough in the absence of any other suggested images), but the un-awareness of the edit-warring rules means that I support keeping the block. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would add that I specifically informed Lobeveeps that he needs to discuss reverted image additions rather than just counter-reverting, and this was clearly ignored. bd2412 T 03:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]