User talk:Lizbetann
Exercising self control in Wiki editing....
[edit]Stopping myself from basically blogging here:
Kievan Theory: How persuasive is that argumentum ex silentio?
[edit]As mentioned in the article, an impediment to accepting the Kievan theory is the fact that proposed marriages between descendants of St. Margaret of Scotland and descendants of Anna of Kiev, Queen of France, would have been within the seven degrees of consanguinity (literally "with [same] blood") that at least would have required a dispensation (papal, episcopal, or otherwise) to permit. For example, Henry the Young King (son of Henry FitzEmpress and Eleanor of Aquitaine) was St. Margaret's great-great grandson and his wife, Margaret of France, was Anna of Kiev's great-great granddaughter. If St. Margaret was Anna of Kiev's niece, that would result in Young Henry and Margaret of France needing a dispensation to marry.
Edith of Scotland's (later called Matilda as Queen of England, along with something like 45% of all the other named women in legal documents of the time and place) descent from St. Margaret as a scion of the House of Wessex was critically important, so we can assume that was still in popular memory at the time of her daughter's grandson's wedding. But since St. Margaret's mother was not important dynastically to the English, I think it is very credible that close blood connection that came through her could be overlooked.
The Kievan Theory still has a basic problem that the only relationship in the (conflicting) primary sources it properly fulfills is "sister of the queen of Hungary"; if it was known that Agatha was the daughter of a Grand Prince, why would it have been rendered as "a woman of noble/royal blood" rather than her specific relation. But given the tendency for endogamy in Medieval Western Europe, I don't think the consanguinity argument to be persuasive in eliminating a Rus background for Agatha. Lizbetann (talk) 23:45, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
IP block exemption
[edit]I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.
Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.
Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.
Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).
I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Fred Talk 13:42, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Lizbetann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 64.111.111.107 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
{{blocked proxy}}: DreamHost.com web hosting
Accept reason: Restoring IPBE. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of artworks with contested provenance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Tudor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)