User talk:LixNew2

This is LixNew2's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kollab (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kollab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The things I said in the article are true. The problem is that our software is not known, so there are no other external sources apart from the software's website. And how do you expect me to support a software. This is just a presentation of the software and its history, so why do you need proof? I'm the creator of this software LixNew2 (talk) 14:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, a few things...

Everything needs to be verifiable from reliable sources. Whether something is 'true' or not doesn't matter, if it cannot be proven to be so.
In any case, we are not interested in what you have to say about your software, but what independent secondary sources (newspapers, magazines, TV and radio programmes, etc.) have said about it, entirely on their own initiative. This is the definition of notability in the Wikipedia context, and is a core requirement for inclusion here. If such sources don't exist, then it won't be possible to have an article on this subject accepted into Wikipedia.
Given that you are writing about your own product, you have a conflict of interest (COI), which must be disclosed. You need to either make the general COI disclosure, or the more specific paid-editing one (I recommend the latter). I will post two more messages here with instructions.
You also must not try to use Wikipedia to promote your software, which is what you're now doing. Promotion of any sort is forbidden, and can lead to your user account being blocked.

HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not promoting my software, just talking about what it's got, like visual studio code, godot, etc.

... LixNew2 (talk) 14:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I don't see why you denigrate my work by making me appear as someone who is just looking for self-promotion or worse: Draft:Kollab, gives the impression that you have a financial interest, no. disclosed in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory disclosure requirements for paid editing.

It’s unacceptable to hear such things! LixNew2 (talk) 14:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LixNew2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kollab has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kollab. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, LixNew2. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello LixNew2. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Kollab, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LixNew2. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LixNew2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kollab

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kollab, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]