User talk:Litha Socenywa

November 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to İpek Bilgin, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Litha Socenywa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

to tell you the truth I don't know why I'm blocked from editing because I am definitely making wiki better

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am sorry I definitely understand what I have done I can't prevent the mistake I have done, I apologise for any inconvenience. This will not be done in the future Litha Socenywa (talk) 11:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020-2030

December 2020

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Litha Socenywa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The administrators of Wikipedia are abusing there power destroying their reputation through arrogance and lust for power, to controll Wikipedia's innocent user's blocking them with no strong valid reasons. Not so long ago I was blocked administrators saying I'm abusing my effection. Using their power to block anyone whose editing. Them, themselves are not taking the responsibility of abuse. Administrators open peaceful sites to horror and desolation of war. It's like arresting someone without any proof. So I'm not going to break my laptop because of administrators that ABUSE their power, I'll move on and stop "Making wiki better"I'll look for another application that I'll take my stress over. Mark my words "YOUR TIME WILL COME", so called administrators. Litha Socenywa (talk) 20:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Requests containing threats are not considered. I am removing your talk page access to prevent more threats and rants. If you should choose to take a different course and actually address the reason for the block, you may use WP:UTRS to make another request that another administrator will review. 331dot (talk) 22:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 22:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]