User talk:LinkOBarry

May 2014

Hello, LinkOBarry. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ric O'Barry, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Daffydavid (talk) 02:24, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jessie Hill Director Headshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jessie Hill Director Headshot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When I see a photo that looks like it might be a professional photograph and it is claimed as the uploader's own work, I routinely ask for the uploader to use the WP:OTRS process. See the message regarding permissions-en@wikimedia.org that is now on File:Jessie Hill Director Headshot.jpg for more information.

Please consider this a compliment. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gary Dourdan Press Headshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gary Dourdan Press Headshot.jpg, which appears to be copied from https://www.facebook.com/officialgarydourdan/photos/a.441671466008.222527.205328956008/10151527265401009/?type=1&theater. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lincoln OBarry PR Headshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lincoln OBarry PR Headshot.jpg, which you've attributed to http://web.archive.org/web/20140501161258/http://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1116726570/XB7Q0145.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:57, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the OTRS process

The 3 images you have uploaded, File:Gary_Dourdan_Press_Headshot.jpg, File:Lincoln_OBarry_PR_Headshot.jpg, and Commons:File:Pr_pic_Jessie_Hill.jpg, all appear to be professional-quality photographs. You claimed to have taken each one. Unless you are a professional photographer or otherwise travel in "celebrity circles" the odds of you taking all 3 are very slim. This leads me to believe you are a professional photographer, a celebrity, or a member of a celebrity's staff or entourage. Given your username, it's possible that you are the person in one of the listed images.

While Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Commons thank you for your contributions, unless a letter is written to OTRS, it is very likely that the Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons communities will decide to err on the legally safe side and delete these images. Why? Well, pretend for a moment that you were a professional photographer and someone you didn't know pretended they took the pictures and uploaded your works to Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Commons without your permission. You would probably want the Wikimedia Foundation to do more than just let them upload the files without so much as asking them to verify that they were the copyright owner. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dolphin Project (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dolphin Project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brad v 03:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! LinkOBarry, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Brad v 03:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dolphin Project has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dolphin Project. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 11:07, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:37, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dolphin Project

Hello, LinkOBarry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dolphin Project".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 12:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]