User talk:Link83

Fair use rationale for File:SNES2Package.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:SNES2Package.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:SNES2ControllerPackage.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SNES2ControllerPackage.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

RE: Nintendo GameCube Controller edits reverted?

"I feel that a list is much more appropriate to show all the available colors, and makes for a much easier read.

I was basing the layout on the 'Xbox 360 Controller' page which also features a 'Colors and Special Editions' section which is in the form of a list, and I have previously added new Xbox 360 controller colors and noticed you have also done the same - so I cant understand why a similar list on the Nintendo GameCube Controller page was completely removed? I will admit that my list wasn't perfect, but I had planned to improve it over the next few days by expanding the information and adding references/links/tidying up."

The main difference between the 360 controller page and the GameCube controller page is the amount of info about each controller. Wikipedia discourages lists if something can be clearly be written as normal prose. In the case of the 360 controller, there is a lot to be said about some (not all) of the controllers; if there were nothing more than main-shell colour differences between the controller (like with most of the GC controllers) then it could be handled in prose too.

"Removing the alternate colors/names denoted in brackets suggests that the English Wikipedia site is completely US centric, which should not be the case. Whilst the purple GameCube controller was called "Indigo" In the US, thats certainly not the case in all parts of the world - in Europe it was simply called "Purple". Having all the colors arranged in a paragraph does not allow room to expand on this."

I wasn't aware of the indigo/purple thing, and I'm from the UK; I just didn't ever look at the advertising at the time so assumed what I saw now (which is mainly US stuff) was representative.

"I hope you wont take my criticisms personally, we have obviously both put work into this page and we both have the best of intentions."

Don't worry, I don't/haven't :).

"I just think a list would be much more appropriate in this instance, paragraphs dont allow room to expand details on specific colors or give any additional controller/color specific information (Such as release dates, regional availability, etc) I also feel that a list would make for a much easier read as can be seen on the Xbox 360 Controller page."

If you have the details to expand it (release dates, quantity released etc.), by all means change it to a similar layout to the 360 controller article, but if all that it is going to do is list colours/what bundle it was with, a short paragraph is preferable as it takes up far less vertical space.

Also, if you have data which can expand things but doesn't justify the list and conflicts with existing data (such as the "matching the common available colors of GameCube consoles" sentence), feel free to reword what's written around it.

Basically what I'm trying to say is if there is a large amount of info about one or two controllers, expand the prose; if there is lots for a few more (maybe 5 or so) or one of the controllers' info is likely to take up a lot of room, put it in a list.

Also, please cite anything you add (especially dates, as those are far more plausible when false) otherwise you might as well have made it up - we can't trust it. If you don't know how to, just put the URL in ref tags like this: <ref>www.url.com</ref>; or copy one of the existing citations (is fairly simple). Also bear in mind that some of the existing data needs sources as well, so if you can find some that'd be great. If not, put {{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} after it unless it is common sense/common knowledge.

One last thing: If you don't have the info now, don't change it to a list. The nature of Wikipedia means that we don't really need to consider "expandability" unless we are making a template or something (and even then it doesn't matter all that much).

I hope I have explained that well enough; feel free to ask for clarification on anything.

Alphathon™ (talk) 23:16, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

One more thing: you can make a page within your user page to build up a prototype before adding it. This prevents any disruption (multiple edits showing up in peoples watchlists etc) and allows a fully-formed new version to be added rather than being done in small sections. Just go to wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Link83/something (where something is what you want to call it). It's quite useful for testing etc as well, and a lot of people (including me) use it for archiving their discussion pages.

Alphathon™ (talk) 23:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

P.S. Do you have any idea why there's a "2" at the top of your talk page? Alphathon™ (talk) 23:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

For the most part that looks great; the only problems I see for the brief look I had were a few minor grammar issues and the fact that the "Luigi" controller was also available in Europe. I have no issue with the "re-release" section; although I don't personally think it's necessary the segmentation takes nothing away from the article so it might as well stay. Alphathon™ (talk) 14:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough about the Luigi thing, I was just assuming that site was accurate. I didn't get my GameCube until about a year and a half ago so I'm not exactly knowledgeable about Club Nintendo/Star Catalogue stuff.

"I just noticed you removed the "Controller" part from the Mario, Luigi and Wario controllers, may I ask why? I was just listing their 'official' names from Nintendo"

Yes, and presumably the official name for the purple one is "Indigo controller"/"Purple controller" (depending on the region). The design would not be called "Mario Controller", which is how it is worded. Since it is in the controller article it can kinda be taken as a given that the packaging would say controller, that's all. Basically it wouldn't make sense for Nintendo to list it or sell it as simply "Mario" (unless it is in a list of controller designs), but in the context of controller colours/designs, it makes no sense not to. Alphathon™ (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

To put it another way, would you change the first bit to Standard colors included "Indigo Controller" (Purple), "Jet Black Controller", "Spice Controller" (Orange) and "Platinum Controller" (Silver)? Alphathon™ (talk) 16:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

IGN seems to think it's called "Original Design Controller: Mario". Presumably they got the name from Nintendo (a catalogue or whatever) since it is in quotation marks, so I don't think the exact wording on the controller box necessarily reflects the "official name" of the controller, just how it was packaged (which make sense since it didn't use standard controller packaging). http://uk.cube.ign.com/articles/528/528721p1.html Alphathon™ (talk) 17:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SNES2ControllerPackage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SNES2ControllerPackage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 07:12, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Nintendo 3DS appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. ArtistScientist (talk) 03:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of NEO N64 Myth Cart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NEO N64 Myth Cart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NEO N64 Myth Cart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 04:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Link83. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Link83. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Link83. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:NEO N64 Myth Cart Front.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NEO N64 Myth Cart Front.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)