User talk:Limewire7
Regarding your edits to Tusshar Kapoor:
[edit]Your recent edit to Tusshar Kapoor (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Regarding your edits to Kareena Kapoor:
[edit]Your recent edits on Kareena Kapoor's page are considered as vandalism. If you continue to vandalise, you will be blocked from Wikipedia. -- Bollywood Dreamz Talk 21:42, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Image:Kareena kapoor.jpg
[edit]
Copyright problems with Image:RahulBose.jpg
[edit]
Copyright problems with Image:Karan Johar.jpg
[edit]
Blocked
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely. You have been falsely claiming ownership of the images you have been uploading and thus placing Wikipedia in legal jeopardy. Until you can explain yourself and give us reason to believe you will never do this again, you will remain blocked. --Yamla 22:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
wow.... ok where should i write my explanations?
- Wite them here. Type {{unblock|your reasons here}}. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 01:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Limewire7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am deeply apologised if I hurt someone's feelings. But the images i uploaded is not violating any
copy right law at all. In fact i also uploaded image on http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Sumedha_Karmahe profile. but no one is taking an objection about that profile. Why? because she is not a big celebrity and the other's are. This is totally unfair to new user, isn't it? Someone has uploaded image for the celebrity that doesn't mean that no one has better snaps at all. Now what should i do to prove that i am not violating your copy rights law....?
Decline reason:
You claimed to be the copyright holder of those image. That is an extremely dubious assertion, which you have not backed up. Produce some evidence, and explain their external presence before you are unblocked. — Haemo 04:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You have claimed to be the copyright holder (that is, the original photographer) for most of the images you uploaded. Please explain why these are appearing on other people's sites if you are the copyright holder. --Yamla 02:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:SumedhaKarmahe.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:SumedhaKarmahe.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 00:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Tushar Kapoor.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tushar Kapoor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. High on a tree 02:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC) High on a tree 02:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Yuvraj Singh.jpg
[edit]An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Yuvraj Singh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —dgiestc 18:54, 25 October 2007 (UTC).
