User talk:Lil' Kaizer

Original research

Hello. Please read this article about Wikipedia's policy about non-sourced content: Wikipedia:No original research. Thank you.

February 2018

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Topp Dogg. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the testWikipedia. Thank you. Dr. K. 03:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Topp Dogg, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dr. K. 03:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Topp Dogg in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Dr. K. 03:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, was my fault. Sorry. Lil' Kaizer (talk) 03:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page maliciously, as you did at Topp Dogg. Dr. K. 03:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why? This is absurd. Lil' Kaizer (talk) 03:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Topp Dogg shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr. K. 03:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is stupid, seriously. Come one, go to see news about Topp Dogg rename to XENO-T instead of blocking me, you don't know how to do your job. Lil' Kaizer (talk) 03:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]