User talk:Lifeartist

Welcome!

Hello Lifeartist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Smeggysmeg 21:16, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Psychology wiki

Hi Joe, checked out your wiki and your blog, etc. - am tempted by your invite message to contribute to Psychology Wiki, however must confess I'm less than tempted due to the prominence of Google Ads on the site. I also think it could be helpful to outline what kinds of contributions would belong best on WP and what in PW, does PW use WP content, etc. I am well meaning, but have seen plenty of crappy WikiMedia installations replicating WP content and which are just ad farms, so I need a little convincing. Kind regards, Jtneill - Talk 23:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clinical career and Wiki Stuff

Hey Lifeartist. I am a psychology undergrad studying just down the road from you, Newman College in Birmingham. I'm hopefully going to get a good degree class and am wanting to work in Clinical. I've recently started tidying up lots of Psychology articles on Wikipedia, and once my exams are over will probably start something on the psychology wiki as well. Just saying hello for now :) Mostly Zen 23:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

= Hi Lifeartist, thanks for your message on my talkpage. I am definately interested in helping out on the Psychology wiki, and will have a look at the topics I am currently revising (biopsychology of depression, schizophrenia and substance abuse) today. After my exams I will be able to contribute more. As for the placement, well, that would be excellent work experience and is exactly the kind of thing I need to do, but I need to earn some money over this summer, so I'm not sure I'd be able to do that full time or for the whole 3 months. I'll contribute to the wiki, see how things go and get in touch with you at some point. Fantastic idea for this wiki by the way, I can see that it will gradually work out very well. Mostly Zen 11:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rating the ToK

Hi Joe. I'm trying to get members of the Psychology Project to get together and rate the both the quality and importance of the Tree of Knowledge System. Hope you're interested. Have a great day! EPM 19:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for peer review

The article Clinical psychology has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the peer review page and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! Psykhosis 20:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you...

To take a look at this [1].

Thank you. Randroide (talk) 11:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Transtherapy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

because most of it is a copyvio of http://www.transtherapy.org, plus no assertion of importance for this movement aged only a few years.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. However if you edit on psychological subjects, I look forward to reading more of your edits and articles.:) special, random, Merkinsmum 19:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DSM-IV Proposal

Would you consider adding any input to our proposal regarding the DSM-IV. Input is being collected on our talk page. Thanks! Mindsite (talk) 22:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Character Strengths and Virtues (book)

The article Character Strengths and Virtues (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability per WP:BK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 08:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Psychology wiki

I have nominated Psychology wiki, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychology wiki. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EMDR Institute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EMDR Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EMDR Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MTHarden (talk) 13:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Psychodrama director

The article Psychodrama director has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article, makes little sense and does not even appear to be about what the title suggests

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Deb (talk) 14:37, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:EnPW

Template:EnPW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Databases for psychologists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Databases for psychologists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Databases for psychologists until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fgnievinski (talk) 00:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]