User talk:Life of Tau/Archive 3

Archives

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Futsal Shuffle 2020

Hi Life of Tau, could you fix the genres in the infobox please? The genres and sources given to support them and the text I think might be being used to support their inclusion:

Trap[1]: Doesn't seem to mention "trap" at all (calls it a "dance track" instead).

Dance[2]: "It’s something that will make you break out into serious footwork on the dance floor."
"Uzi even made a point of sharing a series of instructional dance videos before the record’s arrival."
"“Futsal Shuffle 2020” isn’t your typical hip-hop dance record"

Trance[3]: "Trance-inflected earworm"

Snap[4]: "The Futsal Shuffle is for everyone. Did you save a pair of neon yellow skinny jeans just in case Jerkin’ ain’t dead? The Futsal Shuffle is for you. Have you been waiting impatiently in your white tall tee for the revival of snap music? The Futsal Shuffle is for you. Do you listen to trance music in a Blade-style trench coat? The Futsal Shuffle is for you."
-- 10Trix.Never (talk) 01:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@10Trix.Never: I have addressed each source below.

• Rap-Up: Identifies the song as dance music. Present in the very first version of the article as a source for dance, only later affixed to a different, unsupported genre.

Result: relocated at the correct genre, replacement source cited for trap

• Complex: Describes the song as both hip hop and dance music.

Result: retained as a source for dance music

• Fact Magazine: Describes the song as "trance-inflected", but does not explicitly classify it as trance.

Result: citation and genre removed

• Pitchfork: I draw a distinction between the last two pairs of sentences in the first paragraph. Logically, a writer could only reasonably declare that a song will satisfy people awaiting "the revival of snap music" if it were itself an example of that genre. Conversely, a song could conceivably appeal to someone who regularly listens to trance music, without technically qualifying as trance, if its production featured influences or elements of the style. References to jerkin', rave music, and rap elsewhere in the article are not, as written, unequivocal identifiers of genre.

Result: retained as a source for snap

Thank you for your message. Life of Tau 16:25, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining and fixing it, I thought that about the sentences in the Pitchfork article but wasn't sure. -- 10Trix.Never (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ultravox

Hi, the infobox of the article lists "New Romantic" as a genre, but I only see that here, the recurring genre on WP for acts labeled that term is "new wave". Should it be removed? -- 10Trix.Never (talk) 22:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@10Trix.Never: New Romantic was an aesthetic and cultural movement associated with several music genres, but it is not itself a distinct style of music. Including it in a genre list strikes me as no different than claiming Teddy Boy or British Invasion as genres. However, there appears to be a contingent of editors who feel differently, so I would advise against removal without prior talk page discussion. Life of Tau 18:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thank you. -- 10Trix.Never (talk) 20:35, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Updating view counts

Please update the date of the viewcount when you do this. I am specifically referring to this edit. If you don't do it right, you are just creating a mess for other editors to clean up later. SVTCobra 19:08, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New to You

Hi, could you look at the composition section please? I couldn't find a mention of post-disco in the EDM.com source, but The Guardian review of the album calls the song "a slinky blur of disco and boogie, the romantic crush of strings after the chorus providing a frisson of delight." --10Trix.Never (talk) 04:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"11:00" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 11:00 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#11:00 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]