Jump to content

User talk:Licketysplit101

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fort Davis High School

[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Merope Talk 02:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Please don't vandalize today's featured article. Thank you. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on EA Montreal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 22:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 22:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ultrafest, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall talk 22:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Musger.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Musger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Licketysplit101 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of Shermlindcastle. The block is done with false information. My contributions are tied with him, as we are personal friends, but there is literally no evidence supporting the fact that I am a sockpuppet. His edits and my edits contradict eachother, how can we be the same person?

Decline reason:

Your contributions clearly show that you are closely tied to Shermlindcastle, and your attempts to get him unblocked were disruptive. Whether or not you are different people or the same person is actually beside the point and wikilawyering, and it's the simplest thing in the world to 'have an argument with yourself'. Sam Blacketer 11:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.