User talk:License2Kill

Fair Use Rationale

Hello, I see that you keep adding Image:2pacalypse now.schmiddy.jpg and Image:Juice movie.jpg, however if you look at their Image pages they do not have a Fair Use Rationale for the Tupac Shakur article, only for their articles. Howver if you look at Image:Tupac-mugshot.jpg you will see that there is a Fair use specified specifically for the Tupac article.
Hope this helps. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 09:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

P.S. I fixed your archive box, hope you dont mind. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 09:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I just didn't know that because they been there for awhile. Thanks for fixing my box to. License2Kill 21:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

== Learn2wiki ==

Wiki doesn't deal in opinions. You can add all the opinions you want to the "Loyal to the Game" page, but it will keep being deleted. The shoeshine "review site" you keep using as a source means nothing. That guy doesn't speak for anyone but himself and he can barely pull that off as it is obvious he is barely literate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Real Stucco (talk • contribs) 00:35, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

License2Kill, can you please stop deleting reviews from Tupac albums? You've been removing them this since last month for no reason. This isn't doing good for the article and the last thing I want to do is make a report, but if you continue to remove them, you will be reported for this. Thanks and happy editing. Spellcast 09:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Sales

Hi this is about Tupac's sales, specifically The Don Killuminati. I know its sold over 7 million, but it doesn't mean it's automatically certified 7x Platinum (it should be, but it's not). It's up to the record company to officially apply for the plaque and for some reason they haven't done so yet. In reality, it should be 7x Platinum, but if the official RIAA site has it as 4x Platinum, the article has to go with that. Spellcast 03:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:In Loving Memory.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:In Loving Memory.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Live 2 Tell OST

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Live 2 Tell OST, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Live 2 Tell OST is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Live 2 Tell OST, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 09:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:2Pac Lives.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2Pac Lives.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The Makaveli - The 7 day theory album

I found the references for the article where it says "one of the timeless classics". But I don't know how to put the reference correctly.... I put it in ok, but I need someone to do it correctly. It is the reference number 10.Man please help me with this. This reference can also be used to cite any other fact that needs to be referenced in the article The 7 Day Theory. Fix This as soon as possible...

Nomination of Hit 'Em Up for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Hit 'Em Up, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hit 'Em Up until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Adonnis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adonnis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hasteur (talk) 19:00, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Adonnis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adonnis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. --Finngall ^talk 01:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adonnis

Hello License2Kill. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Adonnis".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adonnis}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 10:19, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adonnis concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adonnis, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

RfA

Hi. With only 30 edits in the last 4 years it is most unlikely that the community will vote to grant you the use of administrator tools. You appear also to have missed all the advice thatis available. For more information, see WP:Advice for RfA candidates. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:53, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

The bottom line is your frequency of editing doesn't give the impression you edit much and there are several areas where you could help such as adding sources to articles that need them or, once you're familiar with the guidelines, commenting at areas such as WP:AfD and WP:AfC. If you need any help, please ask. SwisterTwister talk 16:40, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Adonnis concern

Hi there, I'm Rankersbo. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adonnis, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13, however since you have already done this once you may not get a third chance.

Thank you for your attention.Rankersbo (talk) 22:08, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Rankersbo - would you be able to check if I did it right talk

No, you didn't do it right. You did not need to request undeletion again because the article isn't deleted. What you need to do is continue working on the article. Rankersbo (talk) 10:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The New Testament (The Truth), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Way. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Adonnis concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adonnis, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Adonnis

Hello, License2Kill. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Adonnis".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Until the End of Time (Tupac Shakur album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Still I Rise. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, License2Kill. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)