User talk:Liberi Fatali37

Sutter Union High School

Schedules and nonnotable staff and students are beyond trivial. They don't belong in school articles. In fact, unless you can provide evidence that the school itself is more than a typical school, it might get merged into another article. Corvus cornix_talk 03:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of non-notable people should be deleted as per WP:BIO. If they're notable, then they need to meet the biography guidelines. Corvus cornix_talk 03:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not every person has to have their own biography to be important do they?. Not only must they meet WP:BIO, but even adding them to the article must be supported by a reliable source which is independent of the school's website. Corvus cornix_talk 03:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Being an administrator doesn't mean anything, when it comes to upholding the verifiability policy. The school's yearbook is not a reliable source. Corvus cornix_talk 03:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a reliable source independent of the subject of the article. Corvus cornix_talk 03:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article may not be based primarily on primary sources. Corvus cornix_talk 04:03, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Provide reliable sources, as defined at WP:RS, and we're fine. Corvus cornix_talk 04:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A newspaper, a book, a magazine article, those would be reliable sources. Corvus cornix_talk 04:20, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't provide reliable sourcsw, then the article must be deleted under the verifiability policy. Corvus cornix_talk 04:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sutter Union High School. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 04:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]