User talk:Liberalcynic

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Pigoix, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about the do's and dont's of creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Marasmusine (talk) 08:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

postmodern

please put in the full reference for the definition you just provided. --Buridan (talk) 13:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

health care, et al

Dude, if you don't use the built-in spell-checker (little red dots under words), like when you added this http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Health_care_reform_in_the_United_States&diff=prev&oldid=310376397 you make your edits a magnet for bots that'll revert them. ~{8-)> -65.246.126.130 (talk) 17:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edits that you made to the page Christian Democratic Party (Australia) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --Ariseexacting (talk) 09:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ian McAllister (Political Scientist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ian McAllister (Political Scientist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. MacAddct1984 ^{(talk  contribs)} 16:17, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ian McAllister (political scientist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is another political scientist without a page, I'm working on writing a page on him now.

Stephen White (Political Scientist)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Stephen White (Political Scientist), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/socialpolitical/staff/stephenwhite/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abbott Government, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SBS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abbott Government, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of French intelligentsia

The article French intelligentsia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Rather random collection of facts and opinions about the French post-war intellectual élite. Only source is a dead link. I say WP:NUKEANDPAVE applies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]